By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.

Hide

Defending life
from conception to natural death

FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTube
Join

DIY At Home Abortions: SPUC Set To Mount Appeal After Bid To Outlaw Procedure Rejected by Court

15 August 2018

 

Pro-life campaigners are set to mount an appeal after a judge backed the Scottish Government’s controversial plans to allow DIY abortions at home.

The go-ahead was given by Lady Wise following a two day hearing earlier this year at the Court of Session, in Edinburgh.

The proposal was contested by the world’s oldest pro-life group, the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (Scotland) which mounted a Judicial Review challenging the plan unveiled late last year by Scotland’s chief medical officer (CMO) Dr Catherine Calderwood.

Following the judgement in her favour, John Deighan, chief executive of SPUC Scotland said:

“We are extremely disappointed that our concerns have not been upheld.

“We maintain the belief that our arguments convincingly exposed the unlawfulness of the actions taken by the Scottish Government which are in contravention of the law.

“We will give thorough consideration of the judgement but at the forefront of our thoughts is the expectation that we will appeal the decision. We owe it to our supporters who continue to make donations to cover our legal costs. Discussions have already started with our legal representatives.”

He added:

“Our position remains the same despite this judgement.

“For the sake of women’s health and the universal right to life we cannot stand idly by whilst such a detrimental measure is implemented in the name of health care.

“The abortion pill policy trivialises the terrible ordeal that medical abortion inflicts on women and it can now do so in an environment where women self-administer powerful drugs with no proper medical supervision or support.

“We continue to be alarmed at the Scottish Government’s policies to liberalise abortion, this is hard to square with their other commitments on health and human rights.

“The effect of so many decades of propaganda and emotional manipulation has clouded the judgment of so many people when it comes to abortion. It is outside the realms of reason to uphold universal human rights on the one hand and then make laws to permit the ending of innocent human lives on the other

“The neglect of the damage that abortion has on women is reprehensible and will one day demand an answer as to why it has been allowed to go on so long. The lax attitude towards abortion has also allowed widespread coercion of women to have abortions.

“Rather than really being about a woman’s choice it has so often become an option which women are pushed towards when their pregnancy is inconvenient to others.

“So many women will afterwards say that they had no choice other than abortion. This compounds the mental suffering that post-abortive women endure.”

The CMO’s proposals allow women take an abortion pill at home in the presence of an adult rather in a clinical setting under supervision.

SPUC considered the proposals to be “unlawful” practice and a threat to the health of women and their unborn babies.

The DIY abortion plan involves  sending women from abortion clinics equipped with the drug Misoprostol which they will be able to take in their own house which will result in a termination.

SPUC fought the case on two main grounds.

They stated the 1967 Abortion Act lays down specific rules for approved places where procedures can take place and their legal advice stated that the law “was not intended to allow abortions to take place at home”.

In addition, their legal advice stated taking  an abortifacient (abortion causing) drug at home “is not consistent” with the Abortion Act which demands the presence of medical, nursing or clinical staff.

Lady Wise rejected their arguments on both grounds.

Mr Deighan has already initiated discussions about a possible appeal with SPUC’s legal team.

Notes to editors:

SPUC, the world’s oldest pro-life group, launched its  Judicial Review over the plans unveiled last year by Scotland’s chief medical officer Dr Catherine Calderwood after Westminster devolved abortion responsibilities to the Scottish Parliament in 2016.

She wants to let women take an abortion pill at home in the presence of an adult rather in a clinical setting under supervision.

SPUC consider the proposals to be “unlawful” practice and a threat to the health of women and their unborn babies.

The DIY abortion plan involves  sending women from abortion clinics equipped with the drug Misoprostol which they will be able to take in their own house which will result in a termination.

SPUC fought the case on two main grounds.

They stated the 1967 Abortion Act lays down specific rules for approved places where procedures can take place and their legal advice states that the law “was not intended to allow abortions to take place at home”.

In addition, their legal advice says a woman who takes such an abortifacient (abortion causing) drug at home “is not consistent” with the Abortion Act which demands the presence of medical, nursing or clinical staff.

SPUC (Scotland) chief executive John Deighan is available for interview, filming and/or photographs.

Contact us

For further information contact John Deighan, CEO SPUC Scotland on:

  • Tel: 0141 221 2094
  • Mob: 07802 739265  

Issued on behalf of SPUC (Scotland) by Tom Hamilton Communications

Be the first to comment!

Share this article