By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.


Defending life
from conception to natural death


New guidelines help schools support parents in sex education

23 October 2014

Safe at School has produced new guidelines for primary schools entitled Sex and Relationships Education (SRE) for today's primary school children

This new publication promotes good practice in primary schools where parents are the main educators of their children in sexual matters and where schools have a key role in supporting parents. The guidelines build on the current government guidance, Sex and Relationship Education Guidance – DfEE 0116/2000.

Amid the increasingly loud calls for compulsory PSHE and sex education, SPUC Safe at School is calling for parents to be re-established as the primary educators of their children in sexual matters.

The new guidelines highlight the changes to the primary science curriculum which make clear that sexual matters are not covered in science lessons. Many primary schools interpreted the old national curriculum for primary science to mean that explicit details of sex had to be taught in science lessons, from which parents cannot withdraw their children. This amounted to compulsory sex education by the back door. However the new national curriculum clarifies that sexual matters are not part of primary school science classes.

Safe at School is a campaign of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC)


For further information, please contact SPUC's communications department:

Alternatively, please call Antonia Tully of Safe at School on 07926 007175 or 020 8407 3463.

To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please use the Newsletter Sign-up form to the right of this article.

Add your comment

Comments (1)

  • Mohamed

    11 October 2015, 8:29am

    In short, yes.Politics is the art of the possible.What's the aitrenatlve to the Conservatives and PM Harper?The Three Thugs and their ideologies. That would be far, far worse. God alone knows what other crazy, kinky, abnormal, anti-family, anti-human policies TTT would ram through parliament and into the law.I agree with your point, winteryknight. The CPC has already put their money where their mouth is when it comes to families with kids. And, who knows, with a majority, things may look very different.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval

Share this article