SPUC welcomes appeal hearings in Glasgow midwives abortion case
12 January 2013
Edinburgh, 12 January 2013: The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) welcomed the appeal hearings, held this week in the Court of Session in Edinburgh, in the case of two midwifery sisters who are seeking to uphold the right of conscientious objection to abortion.
The case hinges on the extent to which the law protects the right of conscientious objection to abortions performed on labour wards. The hospital accepts that midwives may opt-out of hands-on involvement in the procedures, but holds that midwifery sisters cannot opt-out of their role of “delegation, supervision and support” of midwives carrying out the abortion procedures.
SPUC supports the right of the midwives to opt-out, and is underwriting their legal costs in the case.
The hospital was successful in arguing for this legal position when the case first went to court last year. The case in the appeal court was concerned with the scope of the conscience clause in the Abortion Act 1967.
Brian Napier QC, for Greater Glasgow & Clyde Health Board, told three judges of the Inner House of the Court of Session that the Board expected midwives to act in accordance with guidance from the Royal College of Midwives.
The Royal College of Midwives is a trade union for midwives. (Not all midwives are members of the union.) The RCM guidance says:
"The RCM believes that the interpretation of the conscientious objection clause should only include direct involvement in the procedure of terminating pregnancy. Thus all midwives should be prepared to care for women before, during and after a termination in a maternity unit under obstetric care."
Counsel for the midwives, Gerry Moynihan QC, argued that the right of conscientious objection encompassed all those who would be part of the team with responsibility for treatment under the Abortion Act.
Judgment is expected in the spring.
For further information, please contact SPUC's communications department on: