New euthanasia ruling worrying as M case continues
28 July 2011
New euthanasia ruling worrying as M case continues London, 28 July 2011 - The latest new ruling by a English high court judge allowing euthanasia by omission is worrying, coming at the same time as another high court judge considers the M case, says a leading anti-euthanasia group.
Patients First Network was commenting on Mr Justice Charles' ruling, reported this morning , that food, fluids and heart medication can be withdrawn from a 54-year-old mother-of-four deemed to be in a so-called "permanent vegetative state".
This court-case is a separate court-case from the M case, currently before Mr Justice Baker, in which a 51-year-old woman, deemed to be in a so-called "minimally-conscious state", is threatened with the same denial of care.
Anthony Ozimic, speaking on behalf of Patients First Network, commented: "Although the court-cases are separate, the M case is being heard against the backdrop of such recent high court rulings which effectively sentenced disabled people to death. The provision of water, food and reasonable medical treatment to patients who are not dying is a human right underpinning the fundamental right to life, yet the English high court has discriminated against disabled people by denying them that right. Whether and to what extent a person has brain-damage is irrelevant to their membership of the human family."
Patients First Network, an initiative of SPUC Pro-Life, operates a helpline for people who fear their loved ones may be in danger of euthanasia.
Anthony Ozimic can be contacted on (0)7939 177683 or (020) 7820 3129. http://www.spuc.org.uk/about/pfn/pfn