By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.

Hide

Defending life from the moment of conception

FacebookTwitterGoogle +1YouTube
Join

Durham North West

General Election 2015

Candidates

Haitham-Taylor, Charlotte

Conservative

Shilcock, Mark

Green

Glass, Pat

Labour

Temple, Owen

Lib Dem

The sitting MP Pat Glass is standing for re-election.

This page shows how the sitting MP has voted on four issues since first being elected.

This reflects only votes which, in our view, are key indicators of the commitment of MPs on these issues. Selected Early Day Motions which your MP has supported are also listed at the bottom of this page (please scroll down).For information about the voting intentions of other candidates in your constituency, please click political@spuc.org.uk and send us an e-mail, putting the name of your constituency in the subject line. Alternatively, call SPUC HQ on 020 7091 7091.

Pat Glass’ record on key votes:

On abortion has voted:

Twice with the pro-life lobby

Never has either been absent or abstained

Once with the anti-life lobby

On protection of the human embryo has voted:

Once with the pro-life lobby

Never has either been absent or abstained

Never with the anti-life lobby

 On euthanasia has voted:

Never with the pro-life lobby

Never has either been absent or abstained

Never with the not pro-life lobby

On ‘same-sex marriage’ has voted:

Never with the lobby defending traditional marriage

3 times has either been absent or abstained

5 times with the lobby redefining marriage in law

Pat Glass signed Early Day Motions on the following subjects:

807 (2010)

which noted the greater risk of underweight babies due to malnutrition of mothers.

936 (2013)

which called for the sex of unborn babies to be recorded to monitor abortions for gender.

1158 (2014)

which opposed changes to the law on assisted suicide.

2835 (2012)

called on the government to reject infanticide.

744 (2015)

which expressed concern about the mitochondrial donation regulations.


Share this article