By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.


Defending life
from conception to natural death


Jury in Inglis murder trial showed great courage

20 January 2010

Jury in Inglis murder trial showed great courage London, 20 January 2010 - SPUC Pro-Life, a leading anti-euthanasia group, has spoken out in support of the jury which today convicted Frances Inglis of murdering her son Thomas.

Paul Tully, SPUC Pro-Life's general secretary, commented: “There are no reports that Thomas ever expressed any wish to die. Like Tony Bland, who survived the Hillsborough football stadium tragedy but was later killed by his doctors, Thomas Inglis’ killing was non-voluntary euthanasia.  “Frances Inglis called her son’s life a ‘living hell,’ and claimed he was in ‘constant pain’. These are phrases that we often hear about disabled people, when others want to impose a ‘right to die’ on them. This reflects the fact that voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia are two sides of the same coin. In either case, the key fact is that the person doing the killing regards the victim as better off dead. This is unacceptable. “It is most regrettable that Miranda Moore QC, the prosecution's lawyer, seems to have accepted, without evidence, that when people like Thomas Inglis were killed it ‘put them out of their misery’. Nevertheless, she secured a conviction, which is some recompense for those who, like Thomas, are unable to communicate their feelings freely. “Some media reports have evoked great sympathy for Mrs Inglis, but in highlighting her conflicted feelings, they are masking other important facts. “The jury has shown great courage in bringing a verdict according to the evidence", concluded Mr Tully.

Be the first to comment!

Share this article