By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.


Defending life
from conception to natural death


Top medic: Abortion should be like "getting your bunions sorted"

18 September 2017

"It beggars belief that Professor Regan describes a life-ending procedure, a lethal attack on an unborn child, in the same breath as going to 'get your bunions sorted'

The president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists has called for abortion to be decriminalised and made more freely available. 

Professor Lesley Regan compared abortion to "getting your bunions sorted" and called for abortion to be decriminalised, the Daily Mail reports. The paper also revealed that the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, which represents almost 6,000 senior doctors specialising in childbirth and women’s health, will hold a vote on whether to support decriminalisation this Friday.

Comparison to bunions

Prof Regan called for the rule that two doctors must sign for an abortion be scrapped. "At the moment it’s illegal, it’s a crime, and it’s the only medical procedure which requires two doctors’ signatures." she said. "Theoretically a woman who procures an abortion by purchasing drugs online could be subject to a criminal prosecution and could face life imprisonment. It would be perfectly reasonable to have one doctor to sign consent like anything else. If you go and get your bunions sorted … you would go to a consultation … then you take a decision and the doctor who was competent to undertake the procedure would sign the form too, and that would go forward."

She also claimed abortions were "either safe in a country with unrestricted access or they become unsafe and result in death. If you don’t support safe abortion then by definition you are supporting and condoning unsafe abortion and serious injuries and death."

More and more signing up to extreme campaign

The Royal College of Midwives and the British Medical Association have already backed the campaign to decriminalise abortion. The professor said of Friday's vote: "I think most of my colleagues who are responsible obstetricians and gynaecologists will probably want to take a view that, as the professionals who undertake the majority of procedures, we need to be at the table."

Seeking to hide crimes

Dr Peter Saunders, of the Christian Medical Fellowship, said that given how many doctors sign for abortion illegally, "it is understandable that [Prof Regan] should seek even less regulation and oversight for her colleagues than at present by pushing for abortion to be removed from the criminal law." But, he pointed out, "how is this different from bankers asking for fraud to be decriminalised, taxi drivers seeking an end to speed limits, or tenants aiming to abolish rental contracts? Surely it is those who most stand to gain by a change in the law who should have least say over how it is framed."

An "insane" proposal

SPUC's Dr Anthony McCarthy commented: "It beggars belief that Professor Regan describes a life-ending procedure, a lethal attack on an unborn child, in the same breath as going to 'get your bunions sorted'.  Women grieve their babies sometimes for years, acutely regretting the speed and casual approach of abortion providers, and their failure to alert them to help available to have the baby.  Doing abortions has a hardening effect and those responsible for them are now seeking to normalise an act that is the very reverse of medicine. One can only hope that members of the College will have enough remaining concern for the women they serve to vote against this insane proposal."

News in brief:


Add your comment

Comments (2)

  • Rita Joseph

    18 September 2017, 9:28pm

    I suspect that ideological mendacity lurks behind the perennial claim that abortion should remain legal in order to make all abortions 'safe'.

    Indeed, it is a curious irony that some of the same proponents of this argument have rightly rejected the argument that Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) should remain legal so that the procedure can be performed 'safely' by trained medical personnel.

    There is logical inconsistency here, for both these mutilating elective surgeries are barbaric, inherently harmful and best avoided altogether.

    Education and legislative programmes are needed urgently to eliminate both these harmful practices.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval
  • Eugene Grant

    26 April 2018, 3:28pm

    It is said that when doctors differ, patients die, in this case babies will die. Such a shame to see how hardened, and uncaring , some of these so called professionals have become.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval

Share this article

  Donate to save lives