By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.

Hide

Defending life from the moment of conception

FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTube
Join

Sexual health doctors back decriminalisation and home abortions

23 November 2017


Abortion ideologues in no way represent good medicine.  

Are criminal sanctions really the reason medics don't want to train to do late term abortions? 

The Council of the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (FSRH) has today voted in favour of supporting "abortion law reform."

The Council of the Faculty, which claims to represent 15,000 doctors and nurses working in sexual and reproductive health, voted today on a new position statement supporting decriminalisation and the taking of the second pill of a medication abortion at home. However, the Faculty was quoted in the Times hours ahead of the vote in support of these changes, making it clear that the vote was a foregone conclusion.

Lack of late term abortion doctors

Dr Asha Kasliwal, FSRH President, said that the country faces a "crisis point in abortion provision", saying that young medics were being put off training to perform abortions because of the threat of criminal sanctions. Figures presented at a Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists meeting in March showed only one person had been trained for abortions between 14 and 19 weeks’ gestation since 2009, and none had been trained to perform abortions beyond 20 weeks.

Blatant self-interest

In a statement welcoming the FSRH's support for decriminalisation, its Vice-President Dr Tracey Masters said: "It is our duty, as healthcare professionals, to provide the best possible care and provide unbiased, evidence-based information for women so they can make the best decisions about their own bodies and their own reproductive health. The best possible care means ensuring that healthcare professionals are appropriately trained and that they can work without fear of criminal sanctions."

However, SPUC's Dr Anthony McCarthy said that this amounts to abortion providers trying to place themselves outside the reach of the law. "Members of this body are likely deeply complicit themselves in the degrading act that is abortion: an act which morally harms and numbs those who carry it out, as well as damaging the expectant mother and her unborn baby", he said. "Such persons and the ideology they promote in no way represent good medicine nor the thousands of medics who seek to support life and health in ways truly respectful of every human being.

"Our Parliamentarians must not let this blatant self-interest influence public policy...Those with most to gain from such a law change should be the last to be allowed to influence the debate."

Taking the trauma home

Dr Masters also welcomed the decision to promote home abortions, hoping that England and Wales will follow the "exemplary lead of Scottish Ministers in granting approval for the second stage of early medical abortion treatment to be taken in a patient’s home."

Clare Bremner, a counsellor for the Abortion Recovery Care and Helpline in Scotland, responded by saying: ""With yet another organisation supporting decriminalisation of abortion and home abortions, I can't help wondering if I am living in a parallel universe. Do all these bodies really not see increased dangers for women in these moves? The push for home abortions takes no account of the many women traumatised by abortion - if they find it distressing to be triggered by going past the abortion clinic or hospital, how are they affected by the site being their own home?

"In my universe, the one shared by the many harmed by abortion, I long for the day the healthcare professional organisations turn their attention to ensuring support for women in crisis pregnancies, and 'evidenced-based information' including for those who regret taking the first tablet and want it reversed. The latter are currently too often misled and unsupported."

News in brief:

Add your comment
Comments (5)
  • ANN

    23 November 2017, 6:38pm

    Try arranging a home birth! But they will let you abort at home - how kind.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval
  • denis

    24 November 2017, 6:12am

    "It is our duty, as healthcare professionals, to provide the best possible care and provide unbiased, evidence-based information for women so they can make the best decisions about their own bodies and their own reproductive health." This is a lie.

    It's long beyond time we challenged these people on the actual words they (mis-)use in their quest for baby-killing. The evidence-based facts are indisputable - the unborn child has a different body, different sex perhaps, to the mother. Evidence proves unborn babies suffer pain when their little bodies are ripped apart in utero by the aborting physician. Who would not ? In the case of the abortive pill system, we do not yet know what the unborn child feels, but an intelligent person may safety assume that the baby suffers greatly during the killing process.

    The reproductive health of the unborn child is 100% OK, safe and sound in its mother’s womb until the abortionists start to ply their – literally – deadly trade.

    We must never let up, we must remind them continually of the fact that the object of abortions is the deliberate killing of the unborn child. Baby dies - Job done. Please pay before you leave the abortuary, we take cash or card or cheque or government transfer. Kerching. Have a lovely day.

    Every time I see “reproductive health” I feel sick. Rather must they say “Want to kill your baby ? We can help you”.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval
  • Craig Tomkinson

    24 November 2017, 4:40pm

    The NHS should be there to save lives not destroy them, The funds used on abortion could be used elsewhere in the NHS.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval
  • Fiona

    25 November 2017, 11:38pm

    Medical students are not trained in how to perform abortions because if they were then the many of them who become GPS would never refer any woman for abortion. They would know too much about what the baby suffers.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval
  • Emma

    26 November 2017, 10:59pm

    The push for home abortions takes no account of the many women traumatised by abortion - if they find it distressing to be triggered by going past the abortion clinic or hospital, how are they affected by the site being their own home?

    Medical abortion happens very quickly. As soon as the second type of pills are taken women can start bleeding straight away or not for several hours. Women don't need to experience an abortion whilst on their journey home and it's not necessary for them to be in a clinic. Personally I would opt for surgical abortion even in the early stages but every woman is different and most women who choose the medical route would prefer to be at home. Good for the sexual health doctors, they are the experts on the frontline.

    As for abortion being decriminalised this view is shared with many Christian groups. Very few people really want to see a woman going to jail for having an abortion. The requirement for 2 signatures just causes unnecessary delay. SPUC are not just out of step with the views of the public they are out of step with their contemporary Christian organisations.

    In the interests of confirmation bias, it's probably best if you don't print this.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval

Share this article




Donate to save lives