By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.


Defending life
from conception to natural death


SPUC condemns compulsory sex education for four year olds

1 March 2017

"Relationships" education will be compulsory at primary school, meaning it will be taught to children as young as four.

Parents should be making decisions about when their children learn about sex not the state, says SPUC Safe at School in response to today's announcement that the government intends to make sex education compulsory from the age of four.

Making sex and relationships education a compulsory school subject means that millions of parents in Britain will lose control over what is taught to their children about sex, said Antonia Tully, National Co-ordinator of the Safe at School Campaign, in a press release.

"Today's announcement is a tragedy,” says Mrs Tully. "Parents will be absolutely powerless to protect their children from presentations of sexual activity which we know are part of many sex education teaching resources for primary school children."

Message that parents are unfit to teach their children

Classroom lessons on pornography and sexting are not a replacement for the loving, ongoing vigilance of parents, says Mrs Tully. "The state simply cannot safeguard children in the same way that parents can. This proposal is sending a huge message to parents that they are unfit to teach their own children about sex."

"Keeping sex and relationships education a non-statutory subject is a vital acknowledgement by the state that parents matter most when it comes to their child's sexual development. Statutory sex education marks a sinister intrusion by the state into family life."


News in brief:

Add your comment

Comments (2)


    1 March 2017, 9:15pm

    Wow! Was expecting the usual hatchet job, but the Independent interviews with pro-lifers is excellent. Let us hope other news outlets take note.

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval
  • Roy bromfield

    4 March 2017, 2:41pm

    It's only for the paeidiaphiles in the establishment they still haven't sorted the sex against children I wonder why?

    Your comment has been submitted and is currently awaiting approval

Share this article

  Donate to save lives