By continuing to browse our site, you are consenting to the use of cookies. Click here for more information on the cookies we use.

Hide

Defending life
from conception to natural death

FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTube
Join

Archive

Tag Cloud

abortion babies motherhood Valentine's day love them both Black History Month Black Lives Matter Martin Luther King Aleveda King Margaret Sanger Marie Stopes Coronation Street Amy Barlow Unprotected March for Life Washington DC pro-life Why we march politics veganism speciesism Veganuary Lord of the Rings Culture of Life Culture of Death baby 2018 SPUC books Christmas gifts apologetics discrimination disability eugenics human rights feminism decriminalisation Theresa May charity Children in Need giving Diana Johnson Northern Ireland abortion law Offences Against the Person Act 1967 Abortion Act euthanasia Down's syndrome Bishop von Galen Nazis home abortion women we care about women fundraising unborn babies cycle Tony Mullet abortion Ireland London Irish United for Life Save the 8th sex education parents relationships school children primary school jeffrey donaldson mp education secretary damian hinds mp 40 Days for Life right to choose right to life prayer vigils trust women Rally to Save the 8th Love both Ireland abortion Ireland pro-life rally for repeal repeal the 8th UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women CEDAW ECHR UN 40 Days for Life Nottingham buffer zones Back Off prayer vigil harassment Mother Teresa love Hilary Clinton BPAS Maria Caulfield Conservatives BMA local DUP Democratic Unionist Party SPUC Scotland John Deighan General Election assisted suicide vote Parliament Where Do They Stand Voiceless conscience film movie IVF fertility industry Naprotechnology Daily Mail exploitation egg-sharing egg-donation funding department of health Fiona Bruce Comic Relief Red Nose Day Save the Children foetal models how you began education young people international Dr Levatino SPUC Youth Conference pro-choice doctor abortionist Paul Tully Glasgow midwives Ann Furedi ethics Action Aid Abortion Rights unsung heroes youth conference Planned Parenthood gendercide youth organ harvesting NHS Africa maternal health population population control

No outsiders? More like no parents rights

Posted by Antonia Tully on 13 March 2019

 
Parents protest outside Parkfield Community School. 

Antonia Tully, SPUC's Campaign's Director, says that the Government is refusing to listen to parents.  

This week, I was interviewed by BBC Radio Kent. The story being covered was the Birmingham primary school which has hit the news because parents are protesting about the use of an LGBT teaching programme called "No Outsiders". The programme has been written by the deputy head at Parkfield, Andrew Moffat, who is openly homosexual and who deliberately chose to teach in a Muslim majority school. He considers that he is in "exactly the right place" and he "no plans to leave".

Closing ranks

In recent weeks, every Thursday morning several hundred parents have staged a protest outside the school calling for an end to ‘No Outsiders’ because they feel that this is indoctrinating their children into accepting values contrary to their beliefs. On one Friday, 600 children were kept off school as part of the protest.  Now Ofsted has come in and declared that No Outsiders is "age appropriate" and the school is rejoicing calling this "great news".  The might of the political and educational establishment has closed ranks against these parents.

"Backward parents"

To get back to my radio interview, the line of questioning soon became apparent.  Presenter Ian Collins described the concerns of the Parkfield protesters as "a charter for bigoted parents" and stated that the parents "are just wrong". Last month I took part in a Sky News interview. My opponent in the debate was Liat Hughes Joshi, who writes on parenting issues.  Her view was that compulsory teaching of same sex relationships is needed because of "backward" parents. Later on that same day, Loic Menzies, who works for LKMco, an education think tank, came out with the stunning statement: "It’s a little bit dangerous to view children as the private property of their parents."

I’m beginning to see a pattern here. Parents who dare to challenge the new orthodoxy in relation to relationships, marriage and family are intolerant, narrow-minded and cannot be trusted to educate their own children in these matters. So-called bigoted parents are now the killer argument to justify teaching children in England about any aspect of sex, in lessons from which, after September 2020, their parents cannot withdraw them. And worse, the state truly believes that they own our children. MP Sir Edward Leigh never spoke a truer word than when, in 2017, he said of compulsory relationships education: "Many parents will view this a state take-over bid of parenting."

Ignoring those most concerned

The Government is refusing to listen to parents. In a recent Government consultation about the content of the new compulsory school subjects of Relationships Education in primary schools and Relationships and Sex Education in secondary schools, 31% of people who responded to the consultation were parents. This was the largest group. An additional 11% of people who responded were grandparents. This means that 42% of people who responded were those with the greatest vested interest in the welfare of children.

Overwhelmingly parents wanted their children in primary school to be taught about the value of marriage between one man and one woman. 50% disagreed strongly with the content of Relationships and Sex Education at secondary school, which reflects grave concerns about teaching young people one particular view about morally contentious issues such as abortion, sexual orientation and transgenderism. These topics are not morally neutral, whatever Ofsted may say.

Government ploughing ahead

Has the Government modified the guidance for schools on what should be taught in these new subjects, given the strength of parental concern? No. If anything the final guidance is even slightly worse than the original draft, as if in response to the majority opposition to its plans the Government has decided to dig in its heals with its new moral agenda hoping they can simply ride roughshod over the opposition. 

SPUC Safe at School has dispatched nearly a quarter of a million postcards to groups and individuals around England enabling people to call on the Secretary of State for Education to give parents the right to withdraw their children from Relationships Education. We have heard not one word from the Department for Education. But they cannot be unaware of the strength of feeling in the country on this issue.

There is no more fundamental instinct in parents than to protect their child from danger. Now is the time for parents to stand their ground and protect their children.  SPUC will continue to campaign to defend the rights of parents because the future of the pro-life movement lies within families.

Add your comment
Comments
  • Terry Wilson said:

    15/03/2019 10:25

    This is an infringement of parents rights. It is appalling that the government is interfering with the way parents want to protect their children, and teach them their values, morals etc. And also the timing of what they think fit for their children. There are so many things that the government could be doing instead, like respect for the environment, respect for their elders, litter dropping, respect for wildlife etc, etc.

Share this article