"We are greatly encouraged by the strong stand taken by such leading political figures--as well as some Labour MPs-against the government's promotion of prescription-free morning-after pills which represent a particular danger to young girls", said John Smeaton, national director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.
"Making pharmacists, instead of GPs, responsible for providing morning-after pills will increase the risk of misuse and harm to women," he continued. "Pharmacists cannot check patients' medical records to see whether they are in a high-risk group for taking the morning-after pill. Moreover, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to ensure that morning-after pills do not get into the hands of girls aged under 16--a concern which has been widely expressed by leading figures in the mass media.
"The British government is making an unprecedented attack on the sanctity of human life in the first few days after conception. The morning-after pill can cause abortions by making the womb a hostile place for the recently-conceived embryo."
John Smeaton also condemned a government measure to allow experiments on cloned human embryos. The move was strongly backed by Tony Blair but opposed by 76 Labour MPs. The measure was passed by the House of Commons last month by 366 votes to 174. Mr Smeaton said: "With the morning-after pill and human cloning we are witnessing a modern massacre of the innocents. Destructive research on cloned human embryos is totally contrary to any concept of fundamental human rights and has been repeatedly condemned by the European parliament. It involves the deliberate creation and destruction of individual human beings through cloning, thereby demeaning the value of human life and undermining the basis of civilised society."
"I suspect many doctors who would make brilliant gynaecologists or obstetricians or infertility experts are giving up their preferred career because of these issues." Dr Shannon went public with his views to urge colleagues to take a stand against abortion.
On a Tuesday afternoon in March of last year, Dr Everett Julyan, 26, walked confidently into the building at North Glasgow Hospital Trust where he was to be interviewed for a place on the GP vocational training scheme. As the swing door closed behind him, he bumped into a friend who had just come from her interview for the same scheme. She warned Dr Julyan that she had been very surprised to be asked about her views on abortion and that he might be questioned about this too. Dr Julyan recalls that the main part of his interview went well. As things came to an end, the chairman of the panel asked, as if as an afterthought, whether he would be willing to 'clerk' patients in for an abortion, taking their temperature, blood pressure and so on. Even after his friend's brief warning, Dr Julyan was completely taken aback by this question. His answer to the panel was "no", even though it flashed through his mind that this answer would probably mean rejection from the training scheme.
He was right. The next day he was telephoned by one of the interviewers to say that, although the panel were very pleased with him, they could not give him a place on the GP training scheme because of his unwillingness to deal with abortion patients. "I was devastated," says Dr Julyan. "I'd been working towards this for two years. I panicked because this was one of the last training posts to be advertised and rejection here meant I could easily be out of a job by July. I phoned my wife at home and she was even more upset than I was. I felt as though all my plans had been blown out of the water.
"I started to talk to my colleagues to try and find out why we were being questioned about abortion. What I discovered was that a particular consultant had insisted that only trainees prepared to look after abortion patients were to be accepted on the scheme because too many were refusing to do this and causing chaos in his unit," continued Dr Julyan.
Still shocked by what had happened, Dr Julyan turned the event over in his mind. "This really challenged me. I asked myself 'Do I really believe it's wrong to get women ready for an abortion operation?' My answer was still 'yes'. I'd give the same answer again at an interview. My pro-life views have been with me a long time. I was brought up in a Christian family, and I go to a bible-based Protestant church. I can't overlook the sixth commandment, which means we should not take innocent human life. Also to my mind, abortion is contrary to what medicine is all about.
"I believe doctors should only ever act in the best interests of their patients. Most women who come to their GPs asking for an abortion are frightened and troubled. Many GPs cannot cope with counselling them and refer them to a consultant who assumes their GP has spoken to them.
"Abortion means the death of a baby and possibly a lifetime of guilt and isolation for the woman. I can offer something far better than that. I can offer a woman front-line counselling and help to guide her to a more positive position. As a woman's GP, I might be the only person who says to her: 'You don't have to do this.' It could make all the difference, and help to save a baby's life."
Dr Julyan's gentle voice is full of concern and conviction as he talks about these issues. "If I'm going to be a good GP, I can't give a patient any treatment which I feel is not good for them. If I do, I'm not serving them properly and I'm compromising my conscience.
"I know there are a lot of young doctors who don't like participating in abortions. By law medical professionals have a right to opt out of abortion procedures as a matter of conscience. For many young doctors and nurses, keeping quiet is the only way forward. I know from experience that it's very difficult to get a job in gynaecology if you are not prepared to help with so-called termination services."
Dr Julyan's traumatic experience has a happy conclusion. On the Friday of the same week as his first interview, he was accepted on to the South Glasgow GP training scheme. South Glasgow Hospital Trust said it was inappropriate to question candidates about abortion.
"My advice to other young doctors who are opposed to abortion is that they should have the courage of their convictions and refuse to do things that they know to be wrong," concluded Dr Julyan. "We must support each other as best we can. It'll be a sad day when GPs who refuse to kill people cannot get jobs."
The law of the UK, on the other hand, creates a totally arbitrary time limit of 14 days, and states that you can manipulate, experiment with and even kill human beings before this stage of development. Now a further refinement has been put to Parliament. MPs have been asked to allow the cloning of these tiny human embryos, creating replicas. The end is good--finding new treatments for disease--but the means is immoral. The tiny cloned human beings are killed before they come to birth.
We have had so little time to halt this descent into madness, to prevent the UK becoming the pariah state of Europe, defying the Council of Europe and the European Parliament.
The tragedy is that science does not need to follow this route. Adult stem cells, and cells from umbilical cords can be used for the same research as cloned embryos, and involve no ethical problems. It is a tragedy that parliament should have been asked to authorise the creation and destruction of thousands--perhaps millions--of lives to effect progress; a progress which could be just as effectively achieved without a single act of killing.
The study, published in the British Journal of Medical Psychology last month, has heightened concern over the impact of induced abortions. British Victims of Abortion (BVA), a nationwide counselling network for women suffering from post-abortion trauma, has found that grief and guilt after abortion are often intense and frequently suppressed for months or years.
Margaret Cuthill, national co-ordinator of BVA, said: "We are not surprised at the figure of 90% of men and women feeling sad after a miscarriage, equating to about 225,000 such cases in the UK every year." By comparison, there were nearly 200,000 induced abortions registered in Britain in 1999.
"We can only guess at the number of men and women out there struggling silently with the secret feeling of loss and guilt due to abortion," commented Ms Cuthill. British Victims of Abortion was formed in 1987 to offer those dealing with the aftermath of abortion a way to recovery--to be at peace with their lost child and with themselves. Many of BVA's supporters and counsellors, including Margaret Cuthill, have been through abortions themselves.
While pointing out that, unlike miscarriage, abortion was deliberately, but not always freely, chosen, she said: "The choice of abortion is often made in panic and fear."
Contrary to what many people might expect, she argues that the pain of loss may be made more acute by the sense of personal responsibility for the baby's death.
Teresa Lynch, a lecturer in nursing at the Cromwell Hospital, London, told the Pro-Life Times: "Legalising euthanasia may place nurses in an impossible situation, if the withdrawal of food and fluid were to be considered part of treatment. Nurses have to be prepared to challenge any developments which undermine moral and professional integrity."
Interested nurses can contact Teresa Lynch RGN RNT on (020) 7341 9086
British democracy is becoming a dictatorship of the majority in which early human embryos are a persecuted minority. They are under threat from abortion (through the morning-after pill) and from laboratory experiments on 'spare' IVF embryos and cloned human embryos. School-children are being targeted by order of the government for increased access to the abortion-inducing morning-after pill and to later abortion under the British Abortion Act.
Today I would ask for your help in two ways. Please write to me at the address below to join our campaign and help us to change the hearts of minds of our fellow-citizens. And please support the campaign in prayer with this prayer from Archbishop Vincent Nichols.
Contact me directly at Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 5-6 St Matthew Street, London, SW1P 2JT, Tel: (020) 7222 5845 Fax: (020) 7222 0630, spucsmeaton@cwcom.net. Join us now!
God our Father, we pray for those who govern this country and for those who have responsibility for its laws. Give them the gifts of wisdom and compassion. Guide their minds to know and acknowledge the truth as the foundation of all compassion. Give us the courage to bear witness to the Gospel of life so that our society may enjoy the peace and stability for which we long. We make this prayer through Christ our Lord. Amen.
Rt Rev Vincent Nichols, RC Archbishop of Birmingham
Legislation passed by the parliament's second chamber last autumn is expected to be ratified shortly, and come into force later this year. But Dr John Keown, senior lecturer in law and ethics at the University of Cambridge and an expert on the Dutch situation, said: "Previously, euthanasia was permitted by case law on the basis of court decisions. I think one of the main lessons to be learnt from the Dutch experience is the lack of control they have had over voluntary euthanasia and how this has helped to allow non-voluntary euthanasia."
Dr Tony Cole, chairman of the Medical Ethics Alliance predicted: "I believe this will lead to an increase in medical killing because the doctors themselves are no longer obliged to report to the authorities."
A report on teenage pregnancy by the Northern Irish health department has been described as a "softening-up process" for bringing in abortion. Myths and Reality recommends better access to contraception and sex advice for teenagers, and makes pointed reference to the ban on abortion in Northern Ireland when it compares teenage pregnancy figures.
Mrs Betty Gibson, SPUC organiser in Northern Ireland, told the Pro-Life Times: "This is part of a softening-up process to bring in abortion. The steering committee that produced this document had representatives from the Brook Advisory Centre and the Family Planning Association.
"Both Brook Advisory Centres and the FPA are committed to legal changes which would bring abortion on demand to Northern Ireland". Mrs Gibson added: "The morning-after pill is deceptively promoted as contraception. Bairbre de Brun of Sinn Féin has personally signed the parliamentary order to make the morning-after pill available on demand at chemists in Northern Ireland.
"This has confirmed our fears at her appointment as health minister because of Sinn Féin's policy of promoting the guidelines of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, the world's leading promoter of abortion." Responses to the document must be lodged by 8 February.
The extra grant--amounting to £25 million--is said to be to ease the UNFPA's "contraception crisis." However when questioned the DfID said that they did not know the details of how it was to be used.
Paul Tully, general secretary of SPUC, said: "The UNFPA promotes abortion and birth control under the guise of reproductive health projects supposedly to reduce maternal deaths. However, even if this money is spent only on contraception and not directly on abortion, this is a very inefficient way of reducing deaths among mothers and babies. Improving care in pregnancy and labour, as well as basic things like clean water, will save many more lives."
Mr Tully added: "As the Population Research Institute puts it, however loudly the UNFPA trumpets the slight reduction in maternal mortality that follows from their massive campaigns to prevent pregnancy, it is clear that its primary goal is to reduce the number of babies born."
In many of the world's poorest countries basic healthcare including maternity provision is in crisis. Funding and provision of abortion have accelerated through the efforts of the UNFPA which last year received an extra £25 million from the UK.