3 Whitacre Mews, Stannary Street
London, SE11 4AB, United Kingdom
Telephone: (020) 7091 7091
Fax: (020) 7820 3131
Email: information@spuc.org.uk
News, weekly update, 16 to 22 March 2006
A UK peer spoke out strongly against the dangers of Lord Joffe's
Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill at a public debate at the
Middle Temple Inn of Court, London. Lord Brennan called the
bill "wrong in principle, unworkable in practice and a serious danger
to the common good of our society". Dr Rob George, a leading palliative
care expert, drew attention to the fact that "The Bill changes a
freedom to die into an entitlement to be killed... Killing is being
regarded as a treatment". A number of groups participated in the
debate, including the Lawyer's Christian Fellowship, the Voluntary
Euthanasia Society (now renamed Dignity in Dying) and the Care Not
Killing Alliance, an umbrella group of medical and political
organisations. [The Universe, 16 March]
The Anglican Bishop of Hereford has publicly opposed the Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill.
Rt Rev Anthony Priddis called on churchgoers to show their opposition to
euthanasia by writing to their MPs and urging them to vote against the bill. He
said that, if assisted suicide were legalised, relationships between doctors
and patients would be seriously undermined and elderly patients could be put
under pressure. The second reading of the bill is expected to take place in
May. [BBC,
21 March] The Bill is expected to have its next reading in the House of
Lords on 12 May.
The parents of baby MB have expressed their joy at Mr Justice
Holman's ruling in the High Court which forbade doctors from removing
their son's life-saving ventilation. MB's father said "I'm glad to be
his father. He deserves life. He deserves to stay alive". Meanwhile
Jeremy Howat, whose daughter also suffers from spinal muscular atrophy,
commented, "My wife and I have a 25 per cent chance of having another
child with SMA. You have to ask yourself whether, at some point in the
future, they would be able to stop people like us from having another
child because it may have SMA. I'm glad that the judge was able to see
this baby as a human being and not a disease". [The Times, 16 March]
China will not change its one-child policy, according to a senior
official in the family planning programme. In an attempt to quash rumours that
the policy could be dropped, Zhang Weiqing, Minister in charge of the National
Population and Family Planning Commission, said, "To maintain the current low
birth rate, the family planning policy must not change." Claiming that the one-child
policy had helped prevent million of births in the last 30 years, Mr Weiqing defended the coercive programme,
saying, "The goal of ensuring Chinese people a relatively comfortable life
would not be achieved if we had 400 million more people." [The Hindu, 22
March]
Nigeria's bishops have warned against the promotion of anti-life
legislation. In the statement issued on 16th March after the meeting of
the Catholic Bishops' Conference in Abuja, the bishops criticised the
Bill on the Establishment of a National Reproductive Health Institute.
"We urge all men and women of goodwill to join hands in denouncing the
culture of death in all its forms and promoting the culture of life",
the statement said. [AllAfrica.com, 15 March]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012
