News, 12 May 2004
Singapore has announced a draft law to ban so-called 'reproductive'
human cloning, The Straits Times reports. The Human Cloning and Other
Prohibited Practices Bill would ban practices such as the implantation
or removal of a cloned human embryo into the body of a human or animal.
It would also be illegal to allow a cloned human embryo to live for
longer than 14 days. [
The Straits Times, 10 May]
Spain's new government is backing legislation that would deprive
doctors of their licences if they refused to perform abortions. The
bill would also create a list of doctors who refuse to perform
abortions. Spain currently allows abortion up to 12 weeks and has one
of the lowest fertility rates in the world at 1.2% [
LifeSiteNews.com, 10 May]
The scientific director of a cord blood bank in Ontario, Canada has
stated that IVF and Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) are not
necessary to find tissue matches for people needing stem cell therapy.
Dr Peter Hollands of Cells for Life said: "If we focused more on
collecting umbilical cord blood from most births and storing the
samples in a public bank there would then be a suitable match for
almost everyone. The 'designer babies' would then not be needed as the
cord blood banks could easily support the demand for cells for
transplantation." [
LifeSiteNews.com, 10 May]
A medical report examining a series of suspicious deaths at a French
hospital has concluded that 14 of the 18 deaths under investigation
were the result of euthanasia. Four patients are said to have died
through active euthanasia whilst the other ten died after being
administered tranquillisers "that could... trigger a respiratory slowdown
leading to death." Dominique Perben, the French justice minister,
suggested last week that doctors be allowed to 'accompany' the death of
the terminally ill without the threat of prosecution. [
The Guardian, 12 May]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2013