News, 1 October 2003
Two women who wanted to use their frozen embryos against the wishes of
their former partners have lost their case in the high court. Natallie
Evans and Lorraine Hadley received IVF treatment but when their
relationships broke down, their partners asked for the embryos to be
destroyed. Judge Justice Ward stated that, though he sympathised, it
was for parliament not the high court to determine the law in this
area. The 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act states that
embryos cannot be implanted without the consent of both parties
involved in their creation. [
BBC, 1 October]
Scotland's cardinal-elect has equated abortion with murder shortly
after his appointment was announced, The Herald reports. He asserted
that the Church cannot compromise on issues 'which we can say are God's
law, like murder, abortion.' [
The Herald, 30 September]
The US government has issued three grants for human embryonic stem
cell research, CNN reports. The National Institutes of Health will be
giving $6.3 million over three years to three centres working on
embryonic stem cells: the University of Wisconsin's WiCell Institute,
the University of Washington Seattle and the associated Fred Hutchinson
Cancer Research Center, and the University of Michigan Medical School. [
CNN, 29 September]
A Danish academic has caused outrage by calling for the state to
encourage intelligent people to have larger families and to restrict
childbearing among those of lower intellectual ability. Helmuth Nyborg
of the University of Aarhus admitted that his proposals to 'improve the
coming generations and avoid degenerates in the population' were
controversial but denied that they had anything to do with Nazi
ideology. Integration Minister Bertel Haarder condemned Nyborg's views
as 'against all moral principles.' [
The Miami Herald, 30 September]
A leading expert on China has criticised the British Foreign Office
over its attitude to China's one-child policy. The Foreign Office's
newly-issued annual human rights report states that "The UK Government
has never questioned China's right or need to implement family planning
policies". [
Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 19 September]
Dr John S. Aird, former senior China specialist at the US Bureau of the
Census, responded: "The continuing support of foreign governments,
UNFPA and IPPF for the Chinese programme has always sent the message
that they really do not take seriously violations of human rights that
advance the cause of population control." [SPUC source]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012