News, 4 March 2003
A gynaecologist in England who allegedly inflicted serious internal
injuries on a woman whose unborn child he was attempting to abort has
denied professional misconduct at a disciplinary hearing in London. The
General Medical Council's professional conduct committee heard that the
accusations against Dr Andrew Gbinigie related to his first day's work
at the Calthorpe private abortion clinic in Birmingham. In the morning
Dr Gbinigie allegedly left foetal body parts inside three patients, and
in the afternoon his attempted abortion of a 20-week-old unborn child
went so badly wrong that the mother had to be rushed to hospital to
have emergency surgery and subsequently lost a kidney. The GMC heard
that Dr Gbinigie ruptured the woman's womb, pulled out a fallopian
tube, an ovary and her ureter, and only realised something was wrong
when he pulled out a piece of her bowel. When the woman's abdomen was
opened in hospital, the "cavity was full of blood and floating on top
was a 20-week-old foetus, largely intact apart from a missing arm and a
missing leg". [
BBC News online, 3 March;
Birmingham Post, 4 March]
Gruesome as these details are, all abortions are acts of killing.
Tragically they are legal in Britain and usually funded by the
taxpayer.
The Jewish-Catholic Dialogue Commission has affirmed the sanctity
and inviolability of human life. The commission, which is composed of
delegates from the Chief Rabbinate of Israel and the Commission of the
Holy See for Religious Relations with Judaism, issued a statement at
the conclusion of its first meeting in Rome declaring that "every human
life is holy, sacrosanct and inviolable". The statement did not mention
abortion explicitly, but declared that any attempt to destroy human
life must be rejected. The statement also affirmed that "every
believer, particularly religious leaders, should co-operate in
protecting human life" and "promoting a 'culture of life'". [Zenit, 3
March:
report and
text of the statement]
Nicaragua's attorney general has announced that no charges will be
brought against anyone involved in an abortion performed on a
nine-year-old rape victim. Maria del Carmen Solorzano ruled that no
laws had been broken because the abortion was carried out to save the
mother's life. However, a panel of experts had concluded only that the
girl's life was at risk whether or not she had an abortion, and the
country's health minister has described the abortion as a crime. The
Catholic Church has ruled that all those involved in the abortion are
automatically excommunicated. [
Seattle Times and
BBC News online, 4 March; see digests for
17,
19 and
25 February]
Clonaid claims to have produced five successfully cloned human babies
between 26 December and 4 February. The company, which is closely
linked to the Raelian cult, claims that the first baby called Eve was
born to an American couple, while subsequent births were to Dutch,
Japanese and Saudi women. No details have been divulged about the
alleged fifth cloned baby. Clonaid's claims have been received with
widespread scepticism and there has still been no independent
confirmation that any of the births actually took place. Clonaid now
claims that work has begun on a "second generation" of clones and on
the production of an artificial womb. [CNS, 28 February; via
Pro-Life Infonet]
A row has erupted in a South African town after women seeking abortions
were reportedly turned away from the local hospital because staff were
refusing to perform the procedure on religious grounds. A group of
residents of Rietvlei near Umzimkhulu in Eastern Cape province have
accused the medical staff of misconduct since the Termination of
Pregnancy Act gives every woman the right to abortion at state
institutions. Dr Nigel Hoffman, head of the hospital, explained that
the "problem" had been caused by a pro-life doctor at the hospital, who
also happened to be his wife. [
iol, 3 March]
Legislators in Montana narrowly defeated a bill last Thursday which
would have required doctors to offer to anaesthetise the unborn
children of women who were having abortions if they were 16 weeks or
more into pregnancy. Members of the Montana House had voted by 52-47 in
favour of the bill in a preliminary vote on Wednesday, but four
legislators changed their mind before the definitive vote and the
measure was lost by 46-51. [
Billings Gazette, 28 February]
In August 2000, a pro-abortion professor in the UK said that all unborn
children aborted after the 17th week of pregnancy should be
anaesthetised during the procedure. SPUC has pointed out that the
anatomical structures necessary for the appreciation of pain are
present in the unborn child before 10 weeks' development. [See
digest for 29 August 2000]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012