News, 27 March 2003
The pro-abortion United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has deployed
"mobile obstetric care surgery units" inside Iraq. The UNFPA, which has
a record of distributing manual abortion kits and abortifacient drugs
to refugees across the world, including from Afghanistan, announced
last week that "reproductive health essentials" were being provided at
sites inside Iraq and in neighbouring countries to meet the needs of
Iraqi refugees expected as a reult of the present military campaign.
UNFPA projects in Jordan, Syria, Iran and Turkey will offer "emergency
reproductive and obstetric care", including "a referral system for
reproductive health services" in Turkey. The UN's definition of
"reproductive health services" includes abortion. [
UNFPA, 21 March; SPUC]
During a series of parliamentary votes on amendments to the Canadian
government's Assisted Human Reproduction bill yesterday, one pro-life
motion were passed and another was defeated. There was a majority of 11
votes in favour of an amendment to ensure that all forms of human
cloning would be banned under the law, but MPs rejected another
amendment to ban all destructive experimentation on human embryos. Mary
Ellen Douglas, national co-ordinator of Canada's Campaign Life
Coalition, said that her organisation would sadly now have to work to
defeat the whole bill because it remained fatally flawed. The third
reading and final vote is expected to take place on Thursday or Friday
next week. [
LifeSite, 26 March]
The judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives has passed
legislation to ban partial-birth abortions. The committee voted by
19-11 in favour of the bill, which will now be debated by the full
chamber. The measure is similar to that passed in the Senate two weeks
ago but, unlike the Senate version, does not include an endorsement of
the Supreme Court's Roe v Wade decision which declared a constitutional
right to abortion in 1973. [
AP, via Kansas City Star, 26 March]
Pro-lifers at the United Nations have expressed satisfaction at the
failure of attempts to define a denial of access to abortion as an act
of violence against women. The 47th session of the UN Commission on the
Status of Women, which met again this week after breaking up earlier
this month in chaos [see
digest for 17 March],
finally concluded on Tuesday without agreement. When the US and
pro-life Muslim countries objected to attempts by the Tunisian chairman
to claim that agreement had been reached on the controversial document
concerning violence against women, a new chairman from South Korea took
over and accepted that the whole document had to be dropped. Peter
Smith, SPUC's chief administrative officer at the UN who attended the
meeting, said: "The accepted procedure is that no document can be
adopted without broad consensus, but the pro-abortionists are willing
to break all the rules to further their radical agenda. On this
occasion they failed, and so we welcome the return to the rule of law
at the UN." [SPUC, 27 March]
The Catholic archbishop of Melbourne in Australia has said that
legislation on embryo experimentation currently before Victoria's state
parliament cannot be supported because it would authorise the killing
of innocent human beings. Archbishop Denis J Hart welcomed provisions
in the bill to ban all forms of human cloning as well as the creation
of human embryos solely for research purposes, but stressed that no
Catholic could vote for the bill unless clauses permitting research on
surplus IVF embryos currently in storage were removed. The archbishop
said: "Thousands of human IVF embryos lie in laboratory freezers today,
powerless, voiceless, unseen. They are human. They are alive. They are
what we all once were. And so they should be treated with reverence and
love." [
Archdiocese of Melbourne, via MediaNet, week of 24 March]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012