News, 14 July 2003
14
July
2003
Following the deaths of the Iranian conjoined twins during separation
surgery, two Egyptian boys joined at the head are to undergo surgery in
the next few months. Ahmed and Mohamed Ibrahim are joined in such a way
that it will be difficult for them ever to walk and at only two years
old stand a higher chance of survival. Dr Kenneth Salyer, the US
surgeon who has been treating them for a year, has said that the
operation will be exceedingly dangerous but the medical team is
confident that the twins can be separated successfully. [
The Scotsman, 14 July]
The German committee on prescription drugs has recommended making the
morning after pill available over the counter, Deutsche Welle reports.
In order for this to come about, the health ministry will have to
approve a statute that will then have to be passed by Germany's upper
legislative chamber, the Bundesrat. Though the article notes that it is
uncertain whether greater availability of the morning after pill will
slow the pregnancy rate or decrease the number of surgical abortions,
women's groups and family planning organisations have welcomed the
decision. [
Deutsche Welle, 11 July]
Italian researchers trying to treat muscular dystrophy using gene
therapy and embryonic stem cells have said that it will be many years
before their research bears fruit, Reuters reports. Dr Giulio Cossu of
the Stem Cell Research Institute in Milan and the University of Rome
said that stem cells had been used to strengthen the muscles of mice
with muscular dystrophy, but a major breakthrough is still years away.
"The results are interesting but we do not want to raise hopes ahead of
time," he told a news conference. "I'm convinced this is an important
result, but this is still not the therapy, for the mice or for
patients." [
Reuters, 14 July]
Schools in Scotland are to be banned from distributing the morning
after pill to girls following a public outcry. Health minister Malcolm
Chisholm stated in an interview: "We have to take account of people's
views. The morning-after pill in schools is not on the agenda at all. I
think people can be reassured. There is obviously a lot of concern
about that among parents and I think we have to look at different ways
of dealing with those issues." [
Scotland on Sunday, 13 July]
SPUC Scotland director Ian Murray welcomed the decision. "Scottish
parents will be relieved by this news that their children's schools
will be an abortion-free zone," he said. "However, we remain concerned
that schoolchildren may still be offered, or even pressured into using,
abortion-inducing birth control by so-called sexual health clinics and
drop-in centres deliberately located near school premises." [
Independent Catholic News, 14 July]
Clinical trials involving sixty women at a Cambridgeshire clinic
have suggested that use of Leukaemia Inhibitory Factor may increase the
chances of IVF embryos implanting. Speaking at the European Society of
Human Reproduction and Embryology in Madrid, Peter Brinsden, the clinic
director, said: "From our initial trial, carried out in collaboration
with the Care Clinic in Nottingham, we believe LIF has exciting
implications for increasing the chances of pregnancy in couples in whom
embryos have previously failed to implant." [
Cambridge News, 11 July]
The New York Catholic Conference, which represents the 8 Catholic
diocese of New York State, has withdrawn its objection to legislation
which obliges hospital emergency rooms to provide abortifacient drugs
to rape victims. The objection was withdrawn on condition that "the
drugs are not contraindicated, the woman is not pregnant and it is
within a medically appropriate amount of time from the attack." [
LifeSite, 11 July]
A SPUC spokesman commented: "by making these stipulations, the
Conference appears to be trying to avoid Catholic hospitals being
placed in the position of providing the drug under circumstances that
would cause abortion. However, it is difficult to see how these
conditions could be applied on a practical level." [SPUC source]
The British Medical Association supports the pre-implantation
selection of embryos to treat a sick sibling, according to the British
Medical Journal. The BMA's annual representative meeting endorsed the
Hashmi judgement, which permitted a baby to be specially selected so
that the brother could be treated with the cord blood. "We need to have
this facility to use this technique when it is needed," said Dr Michael
Wilks, chairman of the medical ethics committee. However, Dr Gregory
Gardner, a Birmingham GP, criticised the selection and destruction of
embryos as "eugenics with a vengeance." [
BMJ, 12 July]
In a report to the Anglican General Synod in York, the Bishop of
Norwich, Graham Jones, asked the Synod to "affirm the sanctity of the
human embryo and therefore the need to treat it with profound respect"
and "to ensure the ethical imperatives in embryo research are never
forgotten." He also asked the Synod to recognise the "different but
principled and sincerely held views among Christians" on the subject of
embryo research. Bishop Jones commented: "Sometimes it seems that the
sophistication of our medical science is not matched by an equally
sophisticated understanding of human psychology or interest in ethical
reasoning." According to the wording of the report, Bishop Jones
appears to recognise the sanctity of human life whilst at the same time
condoning some forms of embryo research. [
Yorkshire Post, 14 July,
Synod Agenda, 12 July]
A survey conducted by Mother and Baby magazine has raised concerns that
mothers may be depriving their babies of the types of food necessary
for healthy growth because of fears that they may become overweight.
Luci Daniels, a state registered dietician, said: "The research
suggests that some mums are using their knowledge of adult weight loss
and 'healthy eating' when choosing what their babies eat, without
understanding that it could be damaging for their child." [
BBC, 14 July]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012