News, 17 February 2003
It is reported that British medical schools have started to restrict
the number of Muslim students because they refuse to learn about
abortion. The proportion of medical students from ethnic minorities in
Britain has risen from 10 percent to 33 percent over the last 20 years,
and the Council of Heads of Medical Schools has expressed concern that
tutors are now unable to teach the full syllabus on account of the
refusal of Muslim students to participate in certain courses which run
counter to their faith. Research indicates that student intake is now
being manipulated so that white applicants are more than twice as
likely to be accepted as their non-white counterparts. [The Times, 17
February]
Dr A Majid Katme, SPUC's Muslim co-ordinator, observed: "The
reported discrimination against pro-life Muslim medical students and
doctors is outrageous, and demonstrates the extent to which respect for
fundamental medical ethics in Britain has declined. 40 years ago the
British medical establishment espoused strongly pro-life values, but
today it has fallen to the Muslim and Christian students, who share a
belief in the sanctity of human life, to repair the damage done by 35
years of legal abortion. All doctors are trained to protect and save
life, and we all have the right to practise our faith. We Muslims
intend to continue doing just that."
Fresh concerns have been raised about the safety of human
cloning after the premature death of Dolly the sheep. The Roslin
Institute in Scotland announced on Friday that Dolly, the world's first
cloned adult mammal, had been put down after she developed a lung
infection. It remains unclear whether Dolly's premature death was
linked to flaws in the cloning process, but the results of post mortem
examinations are eagerly awaited by scientists amid concerns that
cloned animals age prematurely. Pro-lifers observed that Dolly's many
health problems and premature death proved that cloning was dangerous
and impractical. [
BBC News online, 14 February;
Observer, 16 February]
The case of a pregnant nine-year-old rape victim in Nicaragua has
stirred a debate on the laws and ethics of abortion. The child, who was
raped in neighbouring Costa Rica, returned to Nicaragua with her
parents last Thursday after two Costa Rican hospitals refused to
perform an abortion because she was already four months pregnant. Now
Nicaragua's special prosecutor for crimes against children has asked
the government to appoint a special committee of experts to determine
whether an abortion can be carried out on the basis that the mother's
life is at risk. However, several experts have insisted that the
abortion cannot be justified under the law because the girl has an 85
percent chance of surviving childbirth. [
Agencia EFE, 14 February; via Northern Light] Costa Rica and Nicaragua both have pro-life constitutions.
The Evangelical Methodist church of Uruguay (IEMU) has contributed to a
national debate on abortion by stating that women should have the
"right to choose" in extreme situations. The lower house of Uruguay's
national legislature has already passed a bill to allow abortion up to
12 weeks' gestation and, if the bill became law, it would make Uruguay
the first South American country to decriminalise the procedure. As
members of the Senate prepare to debate the measure, the IEMU issued a
statement declaring that life was gift from God and that abortion
should not be condoned, but that women should be allowed abortions in
certain circumstances. It was reported in December that President Jorge
Batlle would veto the bill. [
Worldwide Faith News, 16 February; also see
news digest for 13 December 2002]
A British newspaper has estimated that sex-selective abortion and
infanticide in India has resulted in a current national shortfall of
around 40 million women. Initial results from India's 2001 census are
reported to indicate that there are now 107.8 boys for every 100 girls
among the under-sevens, up from 105.8 boys to 100 girls in 1991. The
BBC reports that an Indian government crack-down on sex selective
abortion is running into trouble because it is hard to prove that
equipment used to scan unborn babies for "abnormalities" is also being
used for sex determination. [
Zenit and
BBC News online, 15 February]
The White House has confirmed that social service agencies in Africa
and the Caribbean will be able to receive some of the $15 billion US
aid budget for HIV and AIDS relief even if they also promote and
provide abortions. Under the Mexico City policy, no international
organisation which either promotes or provides abortion overseas can
receive US aid, but a senior White House official said last week that
an exception was being made for AIDS treatment "as long as none of the
funds are used for family planning purposes or for abortions".
Pro-abortionists were angry that recipients of US funding would not be
allowed to combine their family planning operations with their AIDS
relief work, but the National Right to Life Committee welcomed the US
decision as a "positive step" because no US money would be used to
encourage women infected with HIV to have abortions. [
San Francisco Chronicle, 15 February;
ABC News, 16 February]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012