News, 6 August 2003
A company set up to supply fresh human sperm and eggs via the Internet
is being investigated by the Dutch authorities. There are fears that
the sperm could be infertile or unsafe and the public have been warned
by healthcare officials not to use the company. Marketing human sperm
and eggs is illegal in the Netherlands, but Mr John Michaels, who plans
to launch Baby Donors International next month claims that he is not
breaking the law. [
The Guardian, 6 August]
Ten babies have been born in Britain using aneuploidy screening,
the Guardian reports. The technique allows IVF embryos to be screened
for chromosomal abnormalities at an early stage of development and may
become a standard part of IVF for older women in the future. [
The Guardian, 6 August]
SPUC spokesman Anthony Ozimic commented: "Although we welcome the
bringing of a new life into the world as well as successful treatments
for infertility, the fatal discrimination intrinsic to this technique
killed human beings who were regarded as 'genetically undesirable'....
The process of aneuploidy screening violates the UN Convention on the
Rights of the Child, which states that children 'need special
safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection, before as
well as after birth." [
SPUC Press Release, 5 August]
One of the victims of California's eugenics programme has spoken out
for the first time, RecordNet reports. Charlie Follett, now 73, was 15
when he became one of 20,000 Californian men and women to be sterilised
as part of a programme to weed out those considered morally, physically
and mentally unfit from society. Other states have already begun
considering how best to compensate sterilisation victims though many
are now long dead or remain silent as the subject is still taboo. This
year, state governor Gray Davis issued a general apology to the
victims. [Recordnet.com, 5 August]
The New Jersey Supreme Court has upheld a 'family cap' law
depriving women of benefits if they have additional children whilst
receiving public assistance. New Jersey is one of 23 states to have
adopted such laws which some regard as unconstitutional, as it
interferes with a woman's reproductive freedom and could encourage
abortion. Marie Tasy of Right to Life New Jersey, stated: "The
empirical data proves that abortions increase when states fund abortion
for women and impose family caps. They send a terrible message that the
poor woman and her children are not valued by society." [
LifeNews.com, 6 August]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012