News, 8 April 2003
The English Court of Appeal ruled today that the Human Fertilisation
and Embryology Authority (HFEA) does have the power to authorise the
creation of so-called designer babies to serve as tissue donors for
sick older siblings. The judgement, which overturns an earlier ruling
by the High Court, allows the Hashmi family to create a number of IVF
embryos and then use pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select
those who would be able to provide a bone marrow transplant for
four-year-old Zain Hashmi, who has thalassaemia. The procedure will
almost certainly result in the sacrifice of many of Zain's embryonic
siblings. Josephine Quintavalle of Comment on Reproductive Ethics, the
group which brought the original legal challenge, insisted that
"designing another child as a therapeutic commodity, as a tissue bank,
is definitely not an ethical cure." Paul Tully, SPUC's general
secretary, commented: "Many embryos will now be created - and die - in
this unethical search for genetically desirable children... we regard
it as deplorable to use the suffering of families and children as a
means of emotional blackmail to demand that human embryos in the
test-tube can be chopped up, tested and discarded as if they were inert
samples from an industrial chemical process." [
BBC News online and
SPUC media release, 8 April]
An American institute has claimed that Marie Stopes International (MSI)
is performing illegal abortions in Kenya. Steven W Mosher, president of
the Population Research Institute (PRI), said that investigators
working for his organisation had discovered that MSI used hand-held
manual vacuum aspirators to perform abortions up to and even beyond 16
weeks' gestation under the guise of "post-abortion care" or "menstrual
regulation". When the investigators visited an MSI clinic in Uihiga
District, 300 miles from the capital Nairobi, the clinic manager
confirmed that they provided menstrual regulation (MR), and admitted:
"MR is abortion, so we include it under PAC [post-abortion care]." The
manager also said that MSI did the same thing in all of its 21 clinics
in Kenya. [PRI Weekly News Briefing, 4 April] MSI is an international
abortion promoter and provider based in London. Abortion remains
illegal in Kenya in most cases.
The Australian government is planning to introduce new laws to
crack down on the use of the internet to promote suicide. The proposed
legislation would establish penalties for those who provide information
"that encourages vulnerable individuals to take their own lives" either
on websites or by email. One of the targets of the legislation is
thought to be Dr Philip Nitschke, the prominent Australian campaigner
for euthanasia, who condemned the move as another step in the
government's policy of making it impossible for people to "end their
suffering". [
The Age, 8 April;
CNSNews, 7 April]
An obstetrics and gynaecology specialist in Barbados has warned that
young women are putting themselves at increased risk of developing
breast cancer by having abortions. Dr Shirley Jhagroo, who also acts as
chairperson of the Barbados Cancer Society's breast screening
programme, said that abortion was being used a method of contraception
in Barbados, and that the number of girls aged between 13 and 17 who
were requesting abortions had become alarming. She said that girls of
this age who opted for an abortion were at the same high risk of breast
cancer as women with a family history of the condition and women aged
between 40 and 70. [
Nation Newspaper Barbados, 7 April]
Abortion has been permitted on a broad range of grounds in Barbados
since 1983. 40% of all pregnancies occur in women under the age of 20,
and many end in abortion.
An American cardinal has strongly criticised a Catholic senator
from his state for voting against a ban on partial-birth abortions. In
a letter to Senator Barbara A Mikulski, a Democrat member of the US
Senate for Maryland, Cardinal William H Keeler of Baltimore wrote: "I
am deeply troubled by your continuing insistence that such a heinous
procedure should be available in the United States of America." The
bill to ban partial-birth abortions was passed by the US Senate last
month by 64-33 and is now before the House of Representatives. [
CNS, 7 April]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012