News, 30 April 2003
British nurses are calling for tighter regulations on how the
abortifacient morning-after pill is handed out by pharmacists. The drug
became available from pharmacists throughout the UK without the need
for a doctor's prescription on 1 January 2001, but participants in a
debate at the Royal College of Nursing's annual conference today will
warn that women are not receiving adequate medical checks or being
warned about potential side-effects. It is reported that a motion
calling for regulation of the way in which a pharmacist should assess a
request for the morning-after pill will receive widespread support. [
This is London, 30 April]
Hungary's constitutional court has ruled that cases of so-called mercy
killing should continue to be treated as manslaughter. Patients in
Hungary can already refuse life prolonging treatments under a law
passed in 1997, but the court had been asked to apply the law more
liberally so that cases of euthanasia would not result in a prison
sentence. The president of the court said that the judges had
considered the fact that euthanasia was presently legal only in
Belgium, the Netherlands and one American state [Oregon], and had
concluded that the application of the law in Hungary was
constitutional. Two out of three Hungarians are said to support the
legalisation of euthanasia. [
AFP, 28 April; via Yahoo! News]
The government of Slovakia is preparing a new law to prohibit all human
cloning. A proposed amendment to the country's criminal law, agreed by
the justice minister Daniel Lipsic and other cabinet colleagues, would
mean that anyone who carried out steps directed towards the creation of
a cloned human being at any stage of development would face up to eight
years in prison. [Slovak Spectator International Weekly, 28 April]
The regional bodies responsible for collating the number of legal
cases of euthanasia in the Netherlands have announced that last year's
national total showed a decline. The euthanasia control commissions
said that 1,882 people were killed under the country's euthanasia law
last year, compared to 2,054 in 2001 and 2,123 in 2000. Most of those
who died were suffering from cancer, and legal investigations are
underway into five cases in which the legal criteria may not have been
respected. [AFP, 29 April] Earlier this year it was claimed that Dutch
doctors were performing euthanasia illegally on thousands of patients
because they regarded the legal reporting requirements as too
bothersome [see digest for 3 March].
The US Supreme Court has refused to take up a challenge to a lower
court ruling which upheld state regulations for abortion clinics in
South Carolina. The decision, which was announced without explanation,
does not set a precedent but allows the state regulations, passed in
1995, to come into force. It is reported that the regulations in
question include requirements for a patient's medical records to be
made available to state officials and for members of the clergy to be
informed before an abortion takes place so that they are immediately
available should the abortionist wish to refer a patient to them. [UPI,
28 April]
Four women have appeared in court in Samoa charged with performing
or aiding illegal abortions. One defendant is a registered nurse at a
hospital in Apia, the capital of the independent Pacific island nation,
who has pleaded not guilty to 17 counts of performing illegal
abortions. Another woman has been charged with aiding and inciting her
to procure a miscarriage, while the remaining two co-defendants have
been accused of supplying instruments to be used for abortions. [Radio
Australia News, 28 April] Abortion is illegal in Samoa except to save
the mother's life under laws passed in 1961 and 1969, which appear to
be based on the UK's Offences Against the Person Act 1861. However,
abortions are also allowed to preserve a woman's physical and mental
health following the English 'Rex v Bourne' judgement of 1938. Dominic
Baster, SPUC's international secretary, said: "Despite its geographical
isolation, the international pro-abortion movement is present in Samoa
in the guise of the Samoa Family Health Association which is affiliated
to IPPF. We welcome the fact that the Samoan authorities appear to be
enforcing their restrictive abortion law, and we urge the Samoan people
to provide an example to other countries by ensuring respect for the
right to life of their unborn citizens."
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012