News, 24 April 2003
Scientists in the United States claim to have produced human embryos by
parthenogenesis for the first time. A team led by David Wininger at the
Stemron company in Maryland claims to have succeeded in growing
unfertilised human eggs to the blastocyst stage - the point at which
embryonic stem cells can be extracted for medical research purposes.
The technique has already worked with mice and monkeys, but this is
thought to be the first time it has worked with humans. [
icCroydon, 24 April;
The Age, 25 April]
The scientists claimed that the technique avoided the moral objections
to other means of obtaining embryonic stem cells because the resulting
embryos had no chance of surviving longer than a few days. However,
pro-lifers strongly disagreed. A spokesman for SPUC commented:
"Parthenogenesis is a form of cloning whereby an unfertilised egg is
manipulated in the laboratory to duplicate its genetic material and
become an embryo without being fertilised by sperm. The resulting
embryo has a full set of chromosomes and is clearly human.
Theoretically such embryos could grow into adulthood; in any case, the
status of a human embryo is not affected by how long he or she can be
expected to survive." [SPUC, 24 April; see digests for
23 October 2001 and
1 February 2002]
Two teams of researchers in Britain and Australia have concluded that
the level of exposure to folic acid in the womb may affect an unborn
child's chances of developing leukaemia in later life. The British
researchers found that children with a gene variation which made their
bodies unable to break down folic acid had a significantly lower risk
of leukaemia, and the Australian researchers found that women who took
folic acid supplements during pregnancy almost halved their children's
chances of developing leukaemia. [
BBC News online, 24 April]
Folic acid is already known to protect against neural tube defects such
as spina bifida, and it was reported only this week that it might also
protect against Down's syndrome.
It is reported that one of the foremost promoters of abortion in
the US senate has been asked by his local bishop to remove wording in
his campaign material and congressional biography in which he
identifies himself as a Catholic. Senator Tom Daschle, the Democrat
minority leader in the Senate who represents South Dakota,
self-identifies himself as a Catholic despite his vehement support for
abortion, but a local newspaper reported last week that Bishop Robert
Carlson of Sioux Falls had told him to stop. Neither the bishop nor
Senator Daschle have denied the report, although a press release issued
by Bishop Carlson's office noted only that Senator Daschle had been
asked "to reconsider his position with regard to abortion". [LifeSite,
17 and
22 April]
Campaigners in favour of abortion in Canada have complained that only
17% of hospitals in the country provide the procedure. The Canadian
Abortion Rights Action League has released a report which claims that
only 23% of hospitals in Ontario [Canada's most populous province] and
only 5% of hospitals in Alberta [the fourth most populous province]
provide abortions. No hospitals in either Nunavut or Prince Edward
Island provide abortions, and abortions are only available at one
centre in Manitoba. [
The Winnipeg Sun, 24 April]
Pro-abortionists and pro-lifers in Canada are at odds over whether
elective abortion is a "medically necessary procedure" which provinces
are obliged to fund by law.
Legislators in Mexico have passed a law which bans "all acts that
hinder women's access to information about reproductive health and
contraceptives or that prevent them from deciding on the spacing of
their children" [UN Wire translation]. The legislation appears to be
concerned with protecting women's reproductive, property and labour
rights. [UN Wire, 23 April] Many forms of birth control described as
contraceptives can work as abortifacients. Abortion law in Mexico is
determined at the state level, and most states have restrictive laws.
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012