News, 14 April 2003
It has emerged that an amendment to a proposed directive to ban all
destructive experiments on human embryos was lost by just one vote in
the European parliament last week. Members of the parliament voted last
Thursday to adopt a proposed directive on human tissues and cells which
would ban all human cloning for both reproductive and so-called
therapeutic purposes [see
digest for 10 April].
However, after the amendments to ban all cloning had been passed by
acclaim, the president of the parliament called for a roll-call vote on
the amendment to ban all destructive research. This vote was then tied
on 232 to 232, which meant that the amendment fell. It was for this
reason that some pro-life MEPs, including Dana Rosemary Scallon, voted
against the whole proposal. [SPUC, 14 April]
The creator of Dolly the cloned sheep is pressing ahead with his plans
to clone a human embryo for the purposes of medical research. Professor
Ian Wilmut of the Roslin Institute near Edinburgh will apply to the
UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) for permission
to create a clone of a patient with motor neurone disease (MND). The
embryo's stem cells would then be extracted - a process which would
result in his or her death - and used for research into possible
treatments for MND. It is rumoured that the HFEA is open to accepting
Professor Wilmut's application. A spokesman for the Association of
Medical Research Charities welcomed news of the application, but warned
that it could take many years to develop any treatments. [
The Scotsman, 12 April]
Ethical adult stem cell technology is consistently shown to provide a
more promising alternative to so-called therapeutic cloning - see
digest for 11 April.
The High Court of New Zealand has ruled that women can complete
chemical abortions at home. In a judgement released on Friday, Justice
Durie ruled that women who were given the RU-486 abortion drug regimen
to procure an abortion did not need to stay in hospital until after
their child had been expelled from the womb. In most chemical abortions
after implantation, RU-486 (mifepristone) is used to attack the unborn
child and another drug is then administered 36 to 48 hours later to
expel the dead or dying foetus. This often results in serious bleeding
and trauma. New Zealand's Right to Life group described the judgement
as "a sad and historic day for unborn children and their mothers" and
is likely to appeal. [
New Zealand Herald and xtramsn, 12 April]
Catholics and Buddhists in Taiwan are urging the government not to
consider a proposal to offer abortions to pregnant illegal immigrants
from mainland China. The government is considering a proposal to offer
abortions to women in a detention camp in northern Taiwan [see
digest for 11 April],
but Archbishop Joseph Ti-kang of Taipei told a news conference: "No one
has the right to terminate the lives of others. Abortions represent a
severe violation of fundamental human rights." Yang Shun-oh of the
Buddhist foundation agreed and urged the government to reconsider
because "being anti-abortion is more than a religious stance. It is a
genuine show of respect for life." [
Taiwan News, 12 April]
Police in South Africa are to investigate claims that abortion clinics
in Durban are encouraging women to dump their aborted babies in refuse
bins. Dozens of dead foetuses have been found in open spaces, refuse
bins and toilets over the last few months, and social workers believe
that this is because women are completing their [chemical] abortions at
home and then depositing their dead babies in the streets in plastic
bags provided by the abortionists. [
Daily News, South Africa, 11 April]
The grieving parents of a 17-year-old who killed himself have demanded
action against websites which promote suicide. Tim Piper, an A-level
student from Chippenham in western England, consulted the websites
before hanging himself. [
The Bath Chronicle, 7 April]
The Australian government announced last week that it was considering
laws to crack down on the use of the internet to promote suicide. One
of their targets would appear to be Dr Philip Nitschke, the prominent
pro-euthanasia campaigner [see
digest for 8 April].
The legislative council of New York City has voted to override the
mayor's veto of two bills aimed at facilitating access to the
abortifacient morning-after pill. Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a well-known
pro-abortionist, blocked the measures to oblige city hospitals to
provide the drug to alleged rape victims and to require pharmacists to
display signs indicating the availability of the drug on the basis that
the former was unnecessary and the latter unenforceable. [
LifeSite, 11 April; see
digest for 19 March] It seems that the first of these measures will apply also to Catholic hospitals in the city.
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012