News, 25 September 2002
The Vatican's representative at the United Nations has condemned human
cloning for so-called therapeutic purposes as discriminatory and "a new
kind of racism". Delegates are meeting at the UN in New York this week
to consider a proposal for a global ban on human cloning for
reproductive purposes, but pro-lifers are trying to secure a
comprehensive ban on all human cloning. In his address to the meeting,
Archbishop Renato Martino, the Holy See's permanent observer to the UN,
rejected any distinction between reproductive and so-called therapeutic
cloning, describing the latter as "a new and terrible form of slavery"
because it would lead to a "subcategory of human beings" destined for
the convenience of others. [
Zenit, 24 September]
The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) has forced the
British Foreign Office to address human rights abuses committed under
China's one-child policy for the first time. Following criticism by the
House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee initiated by SPUC, and
pressure from SPUC's 45,000-strong membership, the Foreign Office has
included a section on the one-child policy in its Human Rights Annual
Report (2002 edition issued yesterday). The report expresses "concerns
... such as enforced sterilisations, the abortion of female foetuses
and the abandonment of female children", noting that these "are also a
source of concern for many Chinese people." Anthony Ozimic, SPUC's
political secretary, said that the government could only claim to be
implementing an ethical foreign policy once it followed the US example
and stopped funding the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) which supports
China's population control programme. [
SPUC media release, 24 September]
Pro-lifers in Australia have welcomed a decision by the
attorney-general of New South Wales to consider the extension of
manslaughter laws to include the death of unborn babies. Margaret
Tighe, president of Right to Life Australia, said that the move further
highlighted current inconsistencies in the law regarding unborn
children right across the country. Queensland is currently the only
Australian state to have a law protecting unborn children from violence
other than that perpetrated by abortion. [
Daily Telegraph (Australia), 25 September]
The results of research carried in the UK have suggested that nearly
half of women are misinformed about the side effects of the
morning-after pill. Dr Peter Knapp of the University of Leeds found
that most women knew how to obtain the drug, but that the side-effects
"were often exaggerated or wrongly attributed to the medicine". A
spokesman for SPUC observed: "The reports of Dr Knapp's findings do not
even allude to the abortifacient effect of the morning-after pill,
which causes tens of thousands of early abortions in the UK each year.
Women are being deliberately and cynically misinformed about this
aspect of the morning-after pill, which is wrongly described as a
contraceptive." [
Reuters and SPUC, 25 September]
A spokesman for US President Bush has criticised the new law in
California supporting destructive research on human embryos which was
signed by Governor Gray Davis on Sunday. Ari Fleischer, the White House
press secretary, said: "[The President] believes that all policies,
state or federal, need to respect the culture of life. He differs with
Governor Davis on this." Pro-life groups across the US have also
criticised the law. Wendy Wright of Concerned Women for America said:
"It's disturbing because it's a fundamental disregard for human life."
[Los Angeles Times and Washington Times, 23 September; via
Pro-Life Infonet]
A nationwide survey of Americans has found that younger people are more
likely to hold pro-life views than those in their parents' generation.
The study by the University of California Berkeley found that 44% of
respondents aged between 15 and 22 supported restrictions on abortion,
compared to only 34% of adults aged between 27 and 59. [
Daily Californian, 25 September]
Other opinion polls in the US has shown greater opposition to abortion.
One opinion poll conducted by Gallup earlier this year found that only
25% to 27% of the US population believed that abortion should be "legal
under any circumstances" [see
digest for 25 July].
The manufacturer of the RU-486 abortion drug for the US market has
claimed that more than 100,000 American women have used it since it was
licensed by the US authorities in late 2000. Danco Laboratories also
revealed that there had been a 36% increase in sales of the drug, which
is sold under the tradename of Mifeprex, in the first eight months of
this year. RU-486, or mifepristone, is taken together with another drug
to expel the aborted foetus and is said to be 92% to 95% effective in
ending pregnancy. [
ABC News, 24 September]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012