News, 7 October 2002
A major study sponsored by a British government department has found
that one in four general medical practices in England include a doctor
who will not give consent to abortion. The teenage pregnancy unit at
the department of health based the figure on responses from 40% of
England's 4,000 practices. The conclusion appears to contradict a more
narrow survey conducted by Marie Stopes International (MSI), a major
abortion provider, three years ago which indicated that only 18% of
doctors were opposed to abortion. While MSI expressed concern at the
apparent rise in opposition to abortion among doctors, Dr Michael
Jarmulowicz, master of the Guild of Catholic Doctors, said: "The truth
that abortion is destruction of life cannot be denied forever and it is
encouraging that so many doctors are exercising their right to practise
by such principles." [Daily Telegraph, 7 October]
A federal law legalising abortion in Switzerland has come into
effect. Abortion is now legal during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy as
long as the mother undergoes counselling beforehand. The law had been
passed by the Swiss parliament with the support of two of the four
major political parties as well as the main Protestant denominations,
and was approved by voters in a referendum last June. It is reported
that the new law will have little effect on the total number of
abortions because the procedure was already widely tolerated and there
are between 12,000 and 13,000 abortions performed annually. [
Swissinfo, 7 October]
Dr Germaine Greer, a prominent feminist academic and writer, has
criticised attempts to promote the RU-486 abortion drug. Speaking at a
'Best for Women' conference for gynaecologists and obstetricians in
Australia, Dr Greer revealed that she had been asked to assist in
promoting RU-486. However, she said that it was an "odd situation" in
which abortion was regarded as some kind of privilege and observed:
"These are violently active chemicals and they have violent reactions
on the organism. What is the situation in which a woman would undergo
that kind of assault?" [
The Age, 4 October]
The Catholic archbishop of Philadelphia has said that abortion and
embryo experimentation are based on a false pursuit of individual
freedom or technological progress. In a statement to mark yesterday's
Respect Life Sunday, Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua, who is also chairman
of the US bishops' committee for pro-life activities, observed: "In our
technologically advanced society, we are tempted to treat life as
dispensable ... Abortion is advanced in the name of freedom, but it
undermines freedom by demeaning life itself. No society can truly be
free if its most vulnerable members can lose their very lives at the
hands of others." [
Zenit, 3 October]
Clonaid, a company linked to the Raelian cult, has claimed that several
women on its cloning programme are currently pregnant with cloned
babies of three months' gestation or more. Brigitte Boisselier,
Clonaid's president, claimed that the group began implanting cloned
embryos into women in February, but admitted that the miscarriage rate
had been higher than would be expected in "normal" pregnancies. Ms
Boisselier also claimed that a machine which could be used to
facilitate the cloning process would soon be installed in a laboratory
in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, in response to a growing demand for
reproductive cloning in Africa. [AFP, via
Pro-Life Infonet, 3 October;
Zenit, 4 October]
The Holy See's permanent observer to the United Nations in New York has
refused to attend a charitable fundraising event because the keynote
speaker is known to favour abortion. Archbishop Renato Martino, who
will soon be moving to Rome to take up his new post as president of the
Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, pulled out of the dinner
event to raise money for a homeless shelter run by Franciscan friars
because Libby Pataki, the wife of New York's governor, was to be
honoured. Cardinal Edward Egan, New York's archbishop, had already
declined to attend. [
LifeSite, 4 October]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012