News, 7 November 2002
Reports from the US indicate that pro-life candidates have enjoyed
great success not only in elections for congress but also in elections
for state legislatures and governorships. A number of prominent
pro-life state governors were re-elected, while Alaska, Minnesota and
South Dakota were among the states to elect new pro-life governors.
West Virginia is one of the states where pro-life candidates faired
extremely well in elections for the state legislature. West Virginians
for Life reports that 16 of the 17 successful state senate candidates
were pro-life, while prominent pro-abortionists in the house of
delegates lost their seats. [
Pro-Life Infonet and West Virginians for Life, 6 November]
The focus of funding for international aid through United Nations
agencies is shifting from population control to food aid, according to
figures revealed by a UN official. Patrizio Civili, assistant
secretary-general for policy co-ordination and inter-agency affairs,
said that funding for the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) and the UN
Children's Fund (UNICEF) - both of which are pro-abortion - had
declined, while the World Food Programme (WFP) received $1.9 billion
last year, the highest amount in its history. [
LifeSite, 6 November]
The supreme court of South Carolina is to decide whether so-called
viable foetuses can be protected under child abuse laws. A 1997 ruling
which stated that unborn children who could survive outside their
mother's womb were protected under child abuse laws could be overturned
if the justices reverse a woman's conviction for the homicide of her
unborn child by abuse. The woman in question was sentenced to 12 years
in prison for causing the death of her unborn child by using cocaine
during pregnancy. [
Sun News, 7 November]
South Carolina's 1997 ruling makes it the only state to recognise some
unborn babies as persons under the law, but unfortunately this is
anomalous at present because the 1973 US supreme court decisions in Roe
v Wade and Doe v Bolton established a constitutional right to abortion
up to birth.
Women's activists have been demonstrating in the Indian capital
New Delhi against sex-selective abortion of girls. The demonstrators
chanted "Kill a girl child, kill a nation" in response to newly
released statistics which showed that the imbalance between girls and
boys in India is getting worse, despite laws against sex selection.
Among Indian children under six, there are now only 927 girls for every
1,000 boys, while in New Delhi itself the situation is even worse with
only 865 girls for every 1,000 boys under six. It is reported that many
women who abort their unborn girls do so under pressure from their
husbands or in-laws and often suffer from serious depression
afterwards. [
Middle East Times online, 7 November]
The US state department has insisted that no decision has yet been made
on a proposed $3 million grant to the World Health Organisation for
research on a drug which induces abortion. Eight members of the US
House of Representatives have written to Secretary of State Colin
Powell complaining that the grant has been frozen after pro-lifers
raised objections. A government spokesman said that, while no decision
had been made on where the $3 million allocated for reproductive health
activities would be spent, it could only be used for programmes that
were consistent with US law. [
AP, via Newsday.com, 6 November]
Oregon's attorney general yesterday defended his state's law on
assisted suicide in a brief filed with a federal appeals court. The
state of Oregon is arguing that John Ashcroft, the US attorney general,
acted beyond his powers under the constitution when he effectively
quashed Oregon's law on assisted suicide last year by ruling that
suicide was not a legitimate medical purpose for federally controlled
drugs. Mr Ashcroft's decision was overturned by a federal judge earlier
this year, but the US justice department is now appealing that
decision. [Guardian, 7 November]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012