News, 5 November 2002
It is reported that Sainsbury's, a British supermarket chain, has ended
its participation in a government-backed trial scheme to provide the
abortifacient morning-after pill free of charge to girls under 16
without parents' knowledge. A spokesman for the chain insisted that the
end of the trial had been planned and was not due to any ethical
considerations. [The Universe, 3 November] The Tesco supermarket chain
stopped giving the morning-after pill to under-16s earlier this year
after a campaign by pro-lifers.
The United States has threatened to withdraw its support for the
final declaration of the UN's 1994 Cairo conference on population
because its language is being used to support abortion. At a meeting on
population and development in Bangkok last week, the US delegation said
its government would not reaffirm its support for the Cairo programme
of action unless the terms "reproductive health services" and
"reproductive rights" were changed or removed. Agnes van Ardenne, the
Dutch minister for development co-operation, described the US threat as
"disappointing and incredible" but SPUC challenged her to state whether
the Dutch government had understood the Cairo programme of action as
promoting abortion all along. [New York Times, 1 November; SPUC, 5
November]
The United Nations Population Fund and the Canadian International
Development Agency are targetting Malawi for so-called reproductive
health projects. LifeSite, a Canadian pro-life news resource, reports
that the joint project is providing and distributing abortifacient
methods of birth control in Malawi when the country is being threatened
by famine. Malawi has come under international pressure to abandon its
protection of the unborn. [
LifeSite, 4 November]
Dr Philip Nitschke, the Australian campaigner for euthanasia, has
unveiled plans for acts of civil disobedience to test laws on assisted
suicide. At a public meeting in Australia's capital territory last
week, Dr Nitschke said that groups of 20 people would design and build
portable carbon monoxide generators intended to cause death. He
explained: "If one of those 20 then goes home and uses the device, are
the other 19 responsible for that person's actions? The lawyers are
troubled by this." Dr Nitschke's latest initiative comes in the wake of
his plans to market so-called Exit Bags to facilitate suicide by
suffocation. [
The Canberra Times, 30 October]
An ultrasound technician in Wisconsin is suing his employer for
religious discrimination after he was allegedly dismissed for trying to
talk a patient out of having an abortion. In papers filed with the US
district court in Minneapolis, Donald Grant explains that he was an
ultrasound technician for 15 years without having to deal with the
issue of abortion. When he saw on a patient's chart that she was
considering an abortion in April, his religious beliefs compelled him
to try to dissuade her from going through with it. He claims that he
was told to leave for acting "outside the scope of his position". The
report does not indicate whether the patient kept her child. [
Star Tribune, 5 November]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2013