News, 25 March 2002
The Family Planning Association's legal challenge to Northern Ireland's
abortion practice concluded on Friday at the high court in Belfast. The
Family Planning Association (FPA) claimed that the law concerning
abortion in Northern Ireland was unclear and therefore required
clarification in the form of ministerial guidance. However, Mr Richard
Gordon QC, representing SPUC, rejected this argument. He said that the
law was clear but that, even if this were not the case, guidance could
not constitute an authoritative interpretation of the law and would,
therefore, only add to any lack of clarity that existed. Mr Justice
Kerr will give his judgement after Easter. [SPUC, 25 March]
Mr Justice Rory O'Hanlon, a former Irish high court judge and a
well-respected pro-lifer, has died at the age of 79. He never wavered
in his pro-life stance, and was dismissed from office by Albert
Reynolds, the Taoiseach, in 1992 when he said that Ireland should leave
the European Union if continued membership would lead to the
introduction of abortion in Ireland. Mr O'Hanlon advocated a 'no' vote
in the recent abortion referendum and wrote in the
Irish Times: "...I look forward to seeing it collapse when its full significance dawns on the Irish people." [
Irish Times, 25 March, and SPUC
news digest for 18 October 2001]
The researcher whose study was widely reported in the media last week
as disproving the success of adult stem cell technology has insisted
that the implications of his study were distorted. The study by Naohiro
Terada and colleagues at the University of Florida was interpreted in
the media as demonstrating that adult stem cells were less useful that
stem cells extracted from human embryos. However, Dr Terada gave the
following comments to LifeSite, a Canadian pro-life news service: "I'm
really afraid that our message was somehow distorted by media people.
[W]e never said adult stem cells are no longer hopeful, nor dangerous.
If someone took our message that way, that is a misinterpretation." [
EWTN News, 22 March]
Today is being marked in several Latin American countries as the annual
Day of the Unborn. The day was first established at the civil level by
Argentina in 1998, and today's celebration is also being officially
recognised in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. [
Zenit, 24 March]
The day coincides with the usual date of the solemnity of the
Annunciation, although this year Catholics will celebrate the
Annunciation on 8 April instead because today falls within Holy Week.
Pope John Paul II has reiterated the principle that it may be
wrong to use extreme measures to preserve a patient's life at all
costs. Addressing an international delegation of doctors in Rome, the
Pope said: "Certainly one cannot forget that man is a limited and
mortal being. It is thus necessary to approach the ill with the healthy
realism which avoids generating in those who suffer the illusion of
medicine's omnipotence." The Pope is firmly against euthanasia, and an
editorial in L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican's official newspaper,
reaffirmed last weekend that euthanasia was "a crime against life".
Certain sections of the British media suggested that the Pope had
backed the "right of the sick to die", but this is certainly not the
case. [
The Observer and
BBC News online, 24 March]
A committee of legislators in Arizona has narrowly rejected a measure
which would have required abortionists to give notice to women that
their unborn babies may experience pain during the abortion procedure.
Members of the House Retirement and Government Operations Committee
were tied four to four on whether to accept the amendment, which meant
that it failed. [The Arizona Republic, 22 March] A paper written by Dr
Peter McCullagh and published by the UK parliament's all-party pro-life
group concluded that the structures needed to sense and feel pain are
present and working in the unborn child before 10 weeks' gestation. [
A way of life, SPUC, 2002]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012