News, 5 July 2002
The British Medical Association yesterday rejected calls to reconsider
its policy against assisted suicide. Participants at the BMA's annual
conference rejected any change in the law on assisted suicide following
the case of Dianne Pretty, whose request for a right to assisted
suicide was turned down by the English courts and the European Court of
Human Rights. Dr Vivienne Nathanson, head of the BMA's board of
science, said: "We expressed sympathy for people with motor-neurone
disease who want to end their life, but we are concerned about the
implications... we hope the courts will continue to treat people who
help their loved ones sympathetically." [
The Western Mail, 5 July]
Politicians in Poland have reacted angrily to the vote in the European
parliament to adopt the pro-abortion Van Lancker report. The report
recommends the legalisation of abortion in countries such as Poland and
Malta which have pro-life laws and are applying to join the European
Union. The Polish parliament's European affairs committee rejected the
report's pro-abortion pressure on EU candidate countries. [
BBC News online, 4 July]
The British government has published its
response
to the pro-cloning conclusions of the House of Lords select committee
on stem cell research. The select committee was set up after the House
of Lords voted to authorise the creation and destruction of cloned
human embryos for research last year. The government accepts almost
everything the committee said, except that it declines to compile a
list of what constitutes "serious disease" under the 2001 regulations.
Mr Anthony Ozimic, SPUC's political secretary, observed: "The
government's response is merely the latest of several window-dressing
exercises designed to give the appearance of proper parliamentary
scrutiny, when in fact the whole parliamentary debate on cloning has
been manipulated by the government from the start."
German pro-lifers have criticised the conservative candidate for
chancellor in this year's general election for appointing a strong
supporter of embryo research as his head of policy for the family,
youth and women. Mr Edmund Stoiber, who will lead a coalition of the
Christian Democratic Union and the Christian Social Union into the
general election in September, has appointed 28-year-old Miss Katherina
Reiche to the position, despite her anti-life views. [
BBC News online, 4 July]
New York City's public hospital system this week officially launched
its new policy of requiring all obstetrics and gynaecology doctors who
have completed their education in public hospitals to undergo training
in how to perform abortions. The controversial initiative is in
response to a decline in the number of abortion practitioners in the
US. The pro-abortion Alan Guttmacher Institute estimates that the
number of abortionists fell by a third between 1982 and 1996, and that
nearly half of those remaining are due to retire within the next 10
years. [
Chicago Tribune, 4 July]
Doctors at a maternity hospital in Southampton, England, have "warned"
that plans to introduce a national pre-natal screening programme to
detect unborn children with Down's syndrome will "fail mothers" because
serum tests are not as reliable as had previously been thought. A
spokesman for the department of health said that the warning, published
in the British Medical Journal, would be considered before a decision
on the national programme was made in 2004, and added that any studies
leading to improved ways of detecting Down's syndrome in unborn
children would be welcomed. [
BBC News online, 4 July]
The vast majority of unborn children found to have Down's syndrome are
aborted. A spokesman for SPUC condemned the eugenic mentality behind
this 'warning' and the government's reaction to it. He added: "A
classic demonstration of this appalling eugenic mentality is provided
by the BBC online report, which features a photograph of a smiling and
happy Down's syndrome child, who has just as much inherent value and
humanity as anyone else. Underneath the photograph, the caption notes
that 'screening for Down's syndrome is not infallible', clearly making
the point that the very life of the child in the photograph is a
mistake and proof of the fallibility of screening."
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012