News, 29 July 2002
It has been claimed that the introduction of cut-price air travel
between Ireland and the English Midlands has led to a big rise in the
number of Irish women travelling there for abortions. Reports suggest
that the number of women each year from the Republic of Ireland or
Northern Ireland who come to the Midlands for an abortion has doubled
over the last five years, and that this is due to the low cost of
flights from Dublin and other Irish cities to Birmingham. [Sunday
Mercury, 28 July] Abortion is illegal throughout the island of Ireland.
However, British abortion clinics have been free to advertise in the
Irish Republic following a referendum there in 1992.
The English High Court today dismissed a test case brought by
about 100 women against the third generation contraceptive pill. The
women, who brought their case under the Consumer Protection Act,
claimed that they were not warned that the pill put them at increased
risk of developing blood clots. However, Mr Justice Mackay sided with
the pills' manufacturers, who argued that there was no evidence linking
their product with an increased risk of clots. [
BBC News online, 29 July]
As was made clear in SPUC's recent legal challenge to sales of the
morning-after pill, the conventional contraceptive pill can work as an
abortifacient. SPUC has recently compiled an information booklet about
contraceptive pills and devices which can cause abortions.
Plans to create Scotland's largest abortion facility may now be
scrapped after women and medical staff came out against the idea. There
are currently five abortion clinics in Glasgow, but the city's NHS
Board has suggested that all abortions should be centralised in one
facility, as has happened in other Scottish towns. However, a report
commissioned by the Board and carried out by the pro-abortion Family
Planning Association concluded that a centralised facility would become
a magnet for pro-life pickets, stigmatise patients and cause doctors
whose only duty would be to perform abortions to become depressed.
Professor Allan Templeton, honorary secretary of the UK's Royal College
of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, expressed surprise that medical
staff did not like to perform abortions, saying that it was "an
interesting area" and could be "enormously satisfying". [
Sunday Herald, 28 July]
Pro-abortionists in Toronto have blamed strongly pro-life comments by
Catholic bishops for the fact that young pro-lifers mounted prayer
vigils outside abortion clinics during the events to mark World Youth
Day. Maria Corsillo, an abortion clinic manager, complained that
"religion and prayer can be quite deadly weapons in the wrong hands",
while Archbishop George Pell of Sydney, Australia, was singled out by
pro-abortionists for condemning abortion in an address to young people
at the event. [
Toronto Globe and Mail, 26 July]
The foreign appropriations committee of the US Senate has voted to
weaken the pro-life Kemp-Kasten amendment and reverse the Mexico City
policy. The Kemp-Kasten amendment prevents US tax-dollars from going to
groups which support or participate in coercive abortions or
sterilisations, and was invoked by the US government last week to block
federal funding of the pro-abortion United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA). The Mexico City policy is similar and blocks US federal aid
for groups which either promote or provide abortions overseas. The
committee's decision has no chance of changing the law because any
change would have to win the support of both houses of Congress as well
as President Bush. [Pro-Life Infonet]
Meanwhile, Thoraya Obaid, executive director of the UNFPA, has
thanked its "staunch supporters" in the European Union for their
"generous support". Ms Obaid said that the UNFPA would use the 20
million euros given to it by the EU to provide family planning services
in 22 developing countries, and added that "unwanted pregnancies" and
"unsafe abortions" would not wait. [AllAfrica.com, 26 July; via Northern Light]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012