News, 11 July 2002
A UK parliamentary committee was told yesterday that the "huge abortion
need" in Britain should be addressed by relaxing the legal restrictions
on abortion. The House of Commons health select committee was taking
evidence on the effectiveness of the government's sexual health
strategy, which includes easier access to the RU-486 abortion drug. Liz
Davies, head of abortion provider Marie Stopes International, said that
the requirement for two doctors to sign an abortion certificate should
be abolished and that less-qualified health providers, such as nurses,
should be allowed to perform abortions. This call was supported by Ann
Weyman, chief executive of the pro-abortion Family Planning
Association, who also argued that sex education should start in primary
school. [SPUC, 11 July]
A motion on abortion that was due for debate at this week's
session of the Church of England's general synod in York has been timed
out. The motion expressed "grave concern" at the fact that 500
abortions are performed under the terms of the Abortion Act in England
every day, and called on the government "to bring in urgent legislation
to restrict the abuses of the Abortion Act". The motion was second in
the ballot of private member's motions but could not be debated due to
lack of time. It may now be debated at the general synod's next session
in November. The Church of England's official policy on abortion is
equivocal: it opposes abortion generally but recognises a limited
number of circumstances in which abortion "may be morally preferable to
any available alternative". [SPUC, 11 July;
Church of England website]
Spanish pro-lifers have marched through the streets of Madrid to mark
the 17th anniversary of the legalisation of abortion. The March for
Life last Saturday had the motto: "Protect every life for life".
Spain's 1985 law legalised abortion during the first 12 weeks of
pregnancy in cases of rape, foetal abnormality and risk to the mother's
life or health. In September 1998, after a strong pro-life stand was
taken by the country's Catholic bishops, the Spanish parliament
rejected by just one vote a proposal to relax the law to permit
abortions for personal and economic reasons. [VHI, 10 July; via
Pro-Life Infonet; SPUC and other sources]
A Catholic women's organisation in India has criticised suggestions
that the government should establish a two-child family policy to
counteract the prevalence of sex-selective abortion. The selective
abortion of girls remains common in India, despite the fact that it is
prohibited by law. In some parts of the country, there are now only 800
girls born alive for every 1,000 boys. The Women's Commission of the
Catholic Bishops' Conference of India stated that a two-child family
policy would be "absolutely contradictory, for it is precisely the
two-children norm, coupled with the preference for the male child, that
is responsible for the killing of the female foetus or child". [
EWTN News, 9 July]
The Catholic Church has praised members of the US House of
Representatives for conducting a hearing on new legislation to ban
partial-birth abortions. Cathleen A Cleaver, spokesman for the US
bishops' secretariat for pro-life activities, said that the hearing
confirmed "the truth about partial-birth abortion: there is never any
medical reason to turn to this barbarous procedure". [
PR Newswire, 10 July]
Doctors in Australia believe that cells from inside the nose could be
used to treat paralysis. Olfactory ensheathing cells connect the nose
to the brain and regenerate throughout a person's life. A team led by
Dr Alan Mackay-Sim of Griffith University in Brisbane hopes that, when
these cells are injected into a paralysed patient's spine, they will
provide a bridge enabling spinal nerves to grow. [
BBC News online, 10 July]
This development represents another potential alternative to the use of
embryonic stem cell technology and so-called therapeutic cloning for
repairing damaged nerve tissue.
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012