News, 18 February 2002
Dana Rosemary Scallon, an Irish member of the European parliament and
a widely respected pro-lifer, has explained why she cannot in
conscience support the abortion referendum proposals. Citing the
various ways in which the proposed constitutional amendment would
worsen the situation of unborn children in Ireland, both before and
after implantation, Mrs Scallon said: "My conclusion has been reached
after serious deliberation which has taken into account and been
respectful of the many opinions out forward on the subject. As a
matter of conscience and of my own integrity, my position must remain
the same as it has always been-that I uphold the dignity of every
human being from conception to natural death." [Media release, Dana
Rosemary Scallon MEP, 18 February] Dana's stance is being supported by
a number of pro-life groups in Ireland and elsewhere, including
Ireland for Life and SPUC.
The second baby in the world, and the first in Britain, to have been
selected in the laboratory to provide matching tissue for a sick older
sibling has been born in a London hospital. The child was created by
in vitro fertilisation and then selected from among her siblings
by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis to provide a match for her
four-year-old brother who is fighting leukaemia. Doctors hope that
stem cells extracted from the baby's umbilical cord could be used to
treat her brother if he suffers a relapse. [
Ananova, 16 February]
The president of Portugal supports a referendum on
liberalising his country's law on abortion. President Jorge Sampaio,
who is known to be in favour of abortion, claimed in an interview with
the BBC that there were many illegal abortions taking place in
Portugal and said: "We have to see what is actually happening. We can't
disguise this issue, it's being disguised... We'll probably have to
have a new referendum on this." The last referendum on abortion in
Portugal was held in 1998, when voters rejected a proposal to legalise
abortion in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy by 51% to 49%. [
BBC News
online, 14 February]
It has been reported that 30 Irish hospitals will be licensed to
provide direct abortions if there is an affirmative result in the
abortion referendum on the sixth of next month.
[
Irish Independent, 18
February]
Mr Bertie Ahern, the taoiseach, has turned down a challenge by Mr
Michael Noonan, the leader of the Fine Gael opposition party, for a
televised debate on the referendum. Mr Ahern
said that the referendum proposals were not a party
political issue and that the people had to decide.
[
ibid.]
The papal nuncio to Germany has reportedly spent the past few days in
talks at the Vatican on the fate of the only German bishop to defy a
papal request to end participation in a state-sponsored counselling
scheme through which pregnant women can get the certificate they need
for an abortion. It is thought that, while the Vatican will not
tolerate further disobedience by Bishop Franz Kamphaus of Limburg, it
will not depose him but rather divest him of responsibility for
Catholic pregnancy counselling services in his diocese.
[
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 18 February]
Dr Bernard Nathanson, one of the founders of the pro-abortion movement
in the United States and a former abortion practitioner, who is now a
pro-life campaigner, has urged the people of the Philippines not to go
down the road of legalising abortion. Speaking in Manila, Dr Nathanson
warned that one of the tactics of pro-abortionists was to distort,
fabricate and magnify data, and he said that he doubted claims of
extremely high rates of illegal abortion in the Philippines. [
The
Philippine Star, 17 February; via
Pro-Life Infonet]
Canadian pro-abortionists have launched a television advertising
campaign for the abortifacient morning-after pill. Planned Parenthood
Federation of Canada (PPFC) have distributed five advertisements for
the drug to five national broadcasters and 16 regional broadcasters,
although CTV, one of the national broadcasters, is reported to have
refused to show the advertisements because they are wrongly
being presented as "public-service announcements". The PPFC campaign
will also feature 5,000 posters in health centres, colleges
and universities across Canada. [
LifeSite, 15 February]
The pro-cloning authors of an editorial in last Friday's
Science journal have argued for the abandonment of the term
"therapeutic cloning" in favour of one that does not mention cloning
at all. The researchers argue that the creation and destruction of
cloned human embryos for the purposes of medical research should not
be referred to as cloning because they have no intention of producing
cloned babies. The authors prefer the term "nuclear transplantation"
which they claim is more accurate. [
Reuters Health, 14 February] A
spokesman for SPUC observed: "Pro-cloning researchers and others are
attempting to use linguistic sleight of hand to erode the moral
significance of human cloning. All human cloning is reproductive,
inasfar as a new and distinct human individual is created in every
case."
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012