News, 3 December 2002
The English high court in London has begun hearing a legal challenge to
the power of the UK's fertility regulator to issue licences for
so-called designer babies. Josephine Quintavalle, acting on behalf of
Comment on Reproductive Ethics (CORE), was given permission in July to
mount a judicial review of the decision by the Human Fertilisation and
Embryology Authority (HFEA) to allow the selection of IVF babies using
pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the purpose of producing a
baby to serve as a tissue donor for a sick older sibling. CORE argues
that the HFEA has assumed decision-making responsibilities which are
the exclusive domain of parliament. The case is expected to conclude
tomorrow. [
BBC News online, 3 December]
The pro-abortion Irish Family Planning Association (IFPA) has launched
an attack on the pro-life policies of Dana Rosemary Scallon, a
prominent Irish member of the European parliament. Catherine Heany, a
spokesman for IFPA, said that Dana's campaign against EU funding of
reproductive health programmes [which include the provision of
abortion] in developing countries was putting the lives of women and
children at risk and must not succeed. Ms Heany said that the US
decision to withhold $34 million in aid for such programmes had been
"disastrous", and claimed that the money could have prevented about
5,000 maternal deaths, 77,000 infant and child deaths, and two million
unwanted pregnancies. [Irish Examiner, 3 December] A spokesman for SPUC
said: "Ms Heany's wild, exaggerated and unsubstantiated claims appear
to have spiralled out of control. They are not only absurd but also
completely out of place because other countries have made up for the US
funding." IFPA is an affiliate of the International Planned Parenthood
Federation (IPPF), the world's largest abortion promoter.
A senator in the Philippines has received the backing of the
Catholic Church after he warned that legislation to increase access to
birth control was unconstitutional because it would legalise
abortifacients. Senator Aquilino "Nene" Pimentel Jr. told parliament
that House Bill 4110 and Senate Bill 2335 were contrary to the
country's pro-life constitution because they "would make all sorts of
contraceptives available to women regardless of whether or not those
contraceptives may be suspect as abortifacients". The senator
continued: "Women would have the power to end unwanted pregnancies. In
blunt talk, that means aborting the foetus; safely, perhaps, for the
mother, but most certainly unsafely for the baby whose life would be
terminated with extreme prejudice." A spokesman for the Catholic
Bishops' Conference of the Philippines agreed with the senator's
comments, describing his insights as "invaluable". [
LifeSite, 2 December]
Dr Philip Nitschke, the Australian pro-euthanasia campaigner, has
designed a new machine to facilitate suicide. The device will enable
the users to commit suicide by inhaling carbon monoxide, but will be
marketed as an oxygen machine for legal reasons. Dr Nitschke plans to
unveil the machine, which is expected to cost about £40, at a
conference in the US next month. Earlier this year in Australia, Dr
Nitschke launched so-called exit bags which can be used to facilitate
suicide by suffocation. [
Orange Today, 3 December]
The US supreme court has refused to consider an appeal against pro-life
vehicle number plates in Louisiana, a decision which may bring to a
close a long-running legal battle over "Choose Life" plates in a number
of states. In Louisiana, as elsewhere, a proportion of the proceeds
from the sale of the plates is given to organisations which promote
adoption as an alternative to abortion, but opponents of the plates
have argued that they violate the constitutional separation of church
and state. The supreme court justices rejected the case without
comment. [AP, via Pro-Life Infonet, 2 December]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012