News, 25 April 2002
England's most senior woman judge has ordered prison authorities to
leave a mentally ill prisoner to die of self-inflicted wounds. The
prisoner, known as W, has refused treatment after wounding himself in
protest at the refusal of doctors to treat his mental condition because
they found him too violent. Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss judged that the
prisoner had the capacity to refuse consent for medical treatment, even
if such a refusal would lead to his death. [
BBC News online, 24 April]
SPUC expressed concern that no group had been able to intervene in the
case because of the lack of public information in advance of the
hearings.
The European Court of Human Rights will deliver its verdict in the
Dianne Pretty case on Monday. Mrs Pretty, who has motor neurone
disease, asked the court to rule that she had a right to be helped to
die under the European Convention on Human Rights after the English
courts rejected her claim. [
Ananova, 25 April]
A leading UK scientist has said that hostility to eugenics should be
re-assessed. Richard Lynn, emeritus professor of psychology at the
University of Ulster, said that eugenics had a bad name on account of
its Nazi connotations, but that "the general principle of eugenics,
that we could improve the genetic quality of the population, need[ed]
taking seriously". Professor Lynn pointed out that eugenics was already
being practised by way of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), and
claimed that this technology would "take off, because it satisfies the
needs of individuals, both for themselves and as parents". [
BBC, 26 April]
PGD involves the screening of unborn children created through in vitro
fertilisation, so that only those who meet certain criteria are
implanted. The genetically 'inferior' embryos are usually destroyed.
Legislators in California have voted overwhelmingly for a law
which would oblige hospitals to provide abortifacient morning-after
pills to alleged rape victims. The state assembly passed the
legislation by 44 votes to zero, and it will now pass to the senate. If
the measure is made law, California would become the fourth American
state after Washington, New York and Illinois to enact such a measure. [
Long Beach Press, 23 April]
A member of the Ugandan parliament has called for the legalisation of
abortion. Dora Byamukama, the member for Mwenge South and chairman of
Law and Advocacy for Women in Uganda [an organisation which campaigns
for so-called reproductive rights among other issues] said that
abortion should be permitted in cases of rape and incest. She claimed
that many poorer women died as a result of unsafe, illegal abortions,
and that abortion was already available for rich women. [
AllAfrica.com, 25 April; via Northern Light]
Dominic Baster, SPUC's international secretary, commented: "It has been
a common ploy of pro-abortionists around the world for many years to
cite high numbers of illegal abortions. Their claims are often
unsubstantiated, always unverifiable, and ignore the undeniable fact
that all abortions are deadly for the innocent and vulnerable unborn
children killed by them."
An unborn child has been given a life-saving blood transfusion by
doctors in the United States. Isaac James Melendez, who is not due to
be born until the second half of July, has Rh-positive blood and was
becoming increasingly anaemic because antibodies in his mother's
Rh-negative blood were killing off his red blood cells. A doctor at the
Kaiser Sacramento Medical Centre in California pricked a vein in
Isaac's umbilical cord, drew off some of his blood, and replaced it
with half a pint of donated O Rh-negative blood. [
Sacramento Bee, 20 April; via
Pro-Life Infonet]
This technique was pioneered by the late Professor William Liley 40
years ago, but is rarely used today due to the advent of other
treatments for rhesus iso-immunisation.
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012