News, 18 April 2002
The English high court has rejected SPUC's legal challenge to sales of
the abortifacient morning-after pill from pharmacists. Mr Justice Munby
handed down his judgement this morning, after which SPUC announced its
intention to seek leave to appeal. The judgement ran to 398 paragraphs
in total, but the judge's principal reason for rejecting SPUC's case
was that the term "miscarriage" in the Offences Against the Person Act
1861 should be understood according to what it means today rather than
what it meant when the Act was passed. He asserted that the term
miscarriage today "means the termination of an established pregnancy"
after implantation. This is the first time that such a concept has been
applied in English law.
Paul Tully, general secretary of SPUC, said: "It is a sorry day for
justice when the courts fail to protect unborn life at its most
vulnerable. One of our key objectives in bringing this case has been to
stop the systematic deception of women who have been told that the
morning-after pill is simply a contraceptive. What the government, the
drug company and the pro-abortion lobby have not been able to deny is
that the early developing human embryo is killed by this drug. We want
to see today's judgement challenged in the Court of Appeal, and before
the bar of public opinion. Our campaign to inform the public about the
truth of how the morning-after pill works will continue." The issues of
costs and leave to appeal will be dealt with in a further hearing at
the high court next Thursday. [SPUC, 18 April]
The BBC website features a poll on sales of the morning-after-pill from pharmacists.
A US federal judge ruled yesterday that John Ashcroft, the US
attorney general, acted beyond his powers when he attempted to
invalidate Oregon's assisted suicide law. Mr Ashcroft issued a
directive last November stating that assisted suicide was not a
"legitimate medical purpose" for federally controlled drugs under the
Controlled Substances Act. However, US District Judge Robert Jones
ruled that the justice department could not use this federal law to
overturn Oregon's Death With Dignity Act, which had been approved by
voters in Oregon on two separate occasions. [
AP, via CNN, 17 April]
An Irish study has indicated that women who continue to work through
pregnancy are nearly five times more likely to develop pre-eclampsia
than women who are not in employment. Pre-eclampsia, which is exhibited
by extremely high blood pressure in pregnancy, is potentially
life-threatening to both mother and unborn child. The study was carried
out by doctors at University College in Cork and was published in the
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. [
The Times, 18 April]
State legislators in Virginia have failed to override Governor Mark R
Warner's recent veto of a new partial-birth abortion ban. Members of
the House of Delegates voted by 71 to 28 in favour of overturning the
veto, but the vote in the Senate was won by only 24 to 14, three votes
less than the required two thirds majority. [
AP, via Washington Post, 17 April]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012