News, 30 August 2001
A British government watchdog has attacked a section of the 1967
Abortion Act as discriminatory. The Disability Rights Commission
(DRC), which was set up by the government last year to advise on ways
to combat discrimination against the disabled, issued a statement last
week criticising section 1(1)d of the Act (as amended in 1990) which
allows unborn babies with disabilities to be aborted up to birth. Most
abortions are limited to 24 weeks. The DRC described the section as
"offensive" and "incompatible with valuing disability and
non-disability equally". Voice for Choice, a pro-abortion group, said
that the DRC statement was "an attack on the rights of women to make a
choice." [BBC News online, 21 August]
The US administration of President George W Bush has signalled its
intention to reject the inclusion of any pro-abortion language in the
final document of next month's UN conference on children. Richard
Boucher, a spokesman for the US state department, said that the US
would send a high-level delegation which would head off any attempt to
include reference to abortion counselling or services for adolescents.
[
Washington Post and Reuters, via Pro-Life Infonet, 28 August]
The US Catholic bishops have launched an anti-abortion advertising
campaign which asks: "Have we gone too far?" The advertisements have
been prompted by opinion polls which suggest that most Americans are
uneasy about the extent to which abortion is permitted. The US
Conference of Catholic Bishops announced that the campaign would be
tested in Philadelphia and southern New Jersey and could be extended
nationwide if successful. [Newhouse News Service, via Pro-Life
Infonet, 28 August]
The Roman Catholic Church in the western Indian state of Gujarat has
condemned a proposal to introduce a two-child family population
control policy. Fr Cedric Prakash, a Catholic spokeman, said that the
best way to achieve a reduction in the rate of population growth was
to enable women in the least privileged sectors of society to receive
an education. [Zenit, 27 August]
The governments of France and Germany have proposed an international
treaty to ban reproductive human cloning as an offence to human
dignity. The two countries have asked Koffi Annan, UN secretary
general, to present their proposal at next month's UN general assembly
meeting. [
New York Times, 22 August] The European parliament has
described attempts to distinguish between reproductive and so-called
therapeutic cloning, thus diminishing the moral significance of the
latter, as "linguistic sleight of hand".
Researchers in Italy have suggested that seasonal depression may
influence a woman's decision whether to have an abortion. Angelo
Cagnacci and Annibale Volpe at the University of Modena analysed data
on Italian women collected between 1995 and 1998 and found that the
number of abortions and the number of female suicides both peaked in
May. They suggested that this was because the same factors which push
women to commit suicide might also make them more vulnerable to
pressures to have an abortion. [
New Scientist, 20 August]
Superdrug, the British chain of highstreet chemists' shops, has
revealed that the majority of women to have bought the abortifacient
Levonelle-2 morning-after pill from its pharmacists since the drug
became available without a doctor's prescription at the beginning of
the year have been aged 25 to 35. Two thirds of sales have been in the
south-east of England. Paul Danon, a spokesman for SPUC, said: "The
fact that the 25 to 35 age group are using the morning-after pill goes
against the idea that it is for emergency use only." He continued: "An
abortion is still an abortion, these pills just do it earlier." [BBC
News online, 17 August]
An American man with a rare and potentially fatal skin disorder has
recovered after receiving a transplant of his own adult stem cells.
The man's condition, known as scleromyxedema, was so bad that he could
no longer eat, but doctors in Texas have now reported that he is
symptom-free. The success provides yet more evidence of the potential
of using adult stem cells as an ethical alternative to embryonic stem
cells and so-called therapeutic cloning. [Reuters, via Pro-Life
Infonet, 17 August]
Catholic doctors in Singapore have mounted a prayer vigil against the
use of human embryos in research. Singapore presently has no
regulations to limit such research and many multinational
pharmaceutical manufacturers have been attracted to the country. Dr
John Hui, president of the Catholic Medical Guild of Singapore, said
that the 300 members were praying for an end to embryo research
because "absolute respect should be accorded to the human embryo from
the very beginning of life". [Reuters, via Pro-Life Infonet, 16
August]
The opposition Christian Democrats in Belgium have vowed to take the
issue of euthanasia to the European Court of Human Rights if
legislators vote to legalise it. Belgian senators are expected to vote
on a measure to legalise euthanasia in the Autumn. [
Washington Times,
13 August; via Pro-Life Infonet]
The Brook Advisory clinic in Edinburgh, Scotland, is set to split from
the UK organisation following a management dispute with the head
office in London. Edward Smith, chairman of Brook in Scotland, is
asking board members to back his proposals to declare independence and
to rebrand and rename Brook in Scotland, which has provided abortion
referral services to Scots since the Abortion Act was passed in 1967.
The letter to board members states: "The policy in Scotland is that we
are vigorously pro-choice, but we do not have a position of being
pro-abortion. The stated position of Central Brook in London is
pro-abortion." [
The Scotsman, 25 August]
An IVF clinic in England is reported to have agreed to implant a
post-menopausal woman with her brother's child. The Human
Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which regulates IVF and
embryo experimentation in the UK, has agreed to the procedure taking
place at the Bridge Clinic in London. A spokesman for Comment on
Reproductive Ethics, a pro-life group, criticised the HFEA for
authorising the procedure. [Pro-Life Infonet, 26 August]
The head of an expert group appointed by the British government has
concluded that an unborn child definitely feels pain by 24 weeks'
gestation, the legal time-limit for most abortions in Britain.
Professor Eve Johnstone, chairman of the Medical Research Council's
expert group, said that an unborn child was perhaps aware of pain as
early as 20 weeks' gestation and recommended that further research be
undertaken into effective pain relief for extremely premature babies.
[
Daily Telegraph, 28 August] All of the anatomical structures
necessary for the appreciation of pain are present in the unborn child
before 10 weeks' development.
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012