News, 20 April 2001
A bill to legalise passive euthanasia in Israel has been expanded by a
committee of legislators. The measure to introduce so-called living
wills had already received its first reading in the Israeli
parliament, but members of the Knesset law committee have now
recommended additional provisions such as the validity of body signals
to confirm a wish for passive euthanasia and the authority of an
attorney to request passive euthanasia on behalf of an [incapacitated]
patient. Anat Maor, one of the sponsors of the legislation in the
Knesset, insisted that she did not support active euthanasia as has
been approved in the Netherlands. [
The Jerusalem Post, 19 April]
Pro-life campaigners in the UK have launched a scathing attack on
government plans to introduce new legislation on human cloning [see
news digests for
yesterday and
17 April]. Paul Tully, general
secretary of SPUC, said that the statement by Mr Alan Milburn, the
health secretary, was "a blatant attempt to obscure the government's
promotion of human cloning". He described Mr Milburn's announcement as
"a desperate attempt to talk about everything else but the ethics of
creating cloned human beings in the laboratory". Mr Tully also
expressed his concern that the new legislation would reinforce the
prejudice against clones by obliging researchers to kill them after
they had been "plundered for spare parts". [
SPUC media release, 19
April]
An opinion poll carried out for a pro-abortion group in the Republic
of Ireland has indicated that 62 percent of voters believe that
abortion should be allowed in certain cases. The poll, carried out by
Lansdowne Market Research on behalf of Abortion Reform, also indicates
that fewer than one in five favour a referendum on the issue.
According to the poll, 37 percent believe that abortion should be
legal when the mother threatens suicide and 47 percent believe that it
should be made available in cases of rape or incest. Only 17 percent
of respondents supported the prohibition of abortion in all cases
except when the mother's life was at risk. [
Irish Independent, 20
April; Unison breaking news, 19 April]
It has been reported that almost every Catholic and Lutheran bishop in
Germany condemned euthanasia in their Easter sermons following the
decision by the parliament of the Netherlands to legalise the
practice. Cardinal Karl Lehmann, head of the German Catholic bishops'
conference, said that the Dutch vote had represented a break with
European cultural tradition and indicated that "we are already in the
midst of a culture of death". Cardinal Joachim Meisner of Cologne said
that only a "sick and psychologically degenerate" society could pass
such a law. [
CNS, 19 April]
The number of babies born out of wedlock in the United States
constituted a third of all births for the first time in 1999. The
figures were released this week by the US federal government. US
abortion statistics released last December for 1997 indicated that
women who conceived out of wedlock were more likely to abort their
babies. The majority of abortions in that year were obtained by
unmarried women under the age of 25. [
Washington Times, 18 April;
SPUC
news digest, 13 December 2000]
A boycott of American Express credit cards by pro-lifers in the United
States has expanded. American Express has reportedly been providing
financial support for Planned Parenthood, the United States' largest
abortion provider, for many years and organisations such as the
American Life League and Human Life International refuse to accept
donations through American Express. Women and Children First has
become the latest group to refuse donations via American Express
credit cards following a call to boycott the company by Douglas R
Scott, president of Life Decisions International. [
LifeSite, 19 April]
The US health and human services secretary has expressed his support
for the availability of the RU-486 abortion drug. Tommy Thompson, who
had been viewed by some as having pro-life credentials when he was
appointed by President Bush, insisted that his department would not
review the decision to authorise sales of the drug because there was
no evidence that it was unsafe for women. His comments appear to
contradict his earlier assertions that the health risks of RU-486
would be fully investigated. [
LifeSite, 19 April]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012