News, 17 April 2001
A British government minister has condemned the selective abortion of
children with Down's syndrome. Brian Wilson, a new foreign office
minister, said that the use of amniocentesis tests which resulted in
the elimination of 95% of children found to have the condition
was "grotesque". Mr Wilson, who has a nine-year-old son with Down's
syndrome, also condemned the fact that the "assumed social good" of
eliminating Down's syndrome babies was considered so important that
400 unborn children without Down's syndrome died as a result of
amniocentesis tests each year in Britain in order to identify 100
children with the condition. Mr Wilson added that the loss of so many
Down's children to abortion meant that the "few who do make into the
world" were not given the care which should be given to them in a
civilised society. [
Daily Telegraph, 14 April]
Alan Milburn, the British health secretary, is expected to announce
this week that new legislation will be introduced to ban so-called
reproductive human cloning. The announcement will amount to an
admission that the definition of a human embryo contained in the 1990
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act does not cover cloned embryos.
This has been called the "Macduff loophole" by the ProLife Alliance,
which is currently pursuing the point in a judicial review of the
statutory instrument which authorised destructive research on human
clones. [
The Times, 16 April]
The Dutch health minister has said that elderly people who are "tired
of life" should be allowed to take a suicide pill. Mrs Els
Borst-Eilers said that the use of such a pill should be carefully
regulated to ensure that those taking it really were "tired of life
and desperate to die". She added that the idea did not come within the
provisions of the euthanasia law passed by the Dutch senate last week
because this only allowed doctors to kill patients in "unbearable
suffering". The opposition Christian Democrats criticised Mrs
Borst-Eilers for proposing a step further on from the euthanasia law
only a couple of days after it had been passed. [
CNN, 14 April]
The United States Supreme Court has thrown out a challenge to a
federal law which protects access to abortion clinics. Pro-life
campaigners from New Jersey had argued that Congress overstepped its
authority to regulate commerce on an inter-state basis when it passed
the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, but the Supreme
Court justices had already rejected a number of challenges to this law
on other grounds and rejected the latest appeal without comment.
[
Washington Post, 16 April]
One of the three researchers to be awarded a Nobel prize for the
discovery of the structure of DNA has called for the development of
designer babies. Dr James Watson wrote in a British national newspaper
that scientists should be allowed to remove so-called bad genes which
caused conditions such as Huntington's disease, diabetes or even
cancer from sperm, eggs and embryos, thus making "less random the
sometimes most unfair courses of human evolution". [
Independent and
Metro, 17 April] Further information: Dr Watson is an advocate of
eugenic abortion and infanticide. He wrote in 1973: "...most defects
are not discovered until birth. If a child were not declared alive
until three days after birth, then all parents could be allowed the
choice... the doctor could allow the child to die if the parents so
choose and save a lot of misery and suffering." [Children from the
Laboratory, AMA Prism, ch.3, p.2, J.Watson, May 1973]
It has emerged that US President Bush's proposed federal budget for
2002 includes millions of dollars for so-called Title X funding of
birth control. Ed Szymkowiak, national director of STOPP
International, a division of the American Life League, claimed that
the pro-abortion Planned Parenthood would take about 66 million
dollars from Title X funding in 2002, and that abortifacient chemicals
and intra-uterine devices were among the methods of birth control
which Title X funding provided. [
EWTN News, 16 April]
Scottish scientists have suggested that mothers who eat oily fish
during pregnancy may improve the intelligence and sight of their
unborn children. Researchers at the University of Dundee found that
women who ate oily fish during pregnancy increased the concentration
of DHA (a type of fat which is highly concentrated in the brain) in
both their own blood and that of their child. Tests have shown that
infants with high concentrations of DHA have sharper vision and
perform better in problem-solving tests. [
Ananova, 12 April]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012