News, 9 October 2000
A judge in the English High Court issued orders last Friday giving two
hospitals in the north of England permission to withdraw artificial
nutrition and hydration from two patients considered to be in
permanent vegetative states. This follows the precedent set by the
case of Tony Bland in 1993, since when hospitals have been allowed to
withdraw food and fluids from about 20 patients in similar conditions.
Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, president of the High Court's family
division, decided that the Human Rights Act, which came into effect at
the beginning of last week, could not be applied to prevent the
orders. This Act incorporated certain aspects of the European
Convention on Human Rights into English law, including the right to
life in the second article and the right not to be subjected to
inhuman or degrading treatment in the third article. Dame Elizabeth's
written judgement will address the relevance of these and other
articles, although the date of its publication is not known. The
orders read out in court included reference to the patients' "best
interests" for the first time. Paul Tully, general secretary of the
Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said: "This judgement
will appal anyone who supports the notion of the Human Rights Act as a
bulwark for the rights of the weak, the disabled and the dependent
against the power of the establishment." [BBC News online, SPUC media
release and eye-witness report, 6 October]
A junior doctor has claimed that he was turned down for a job at a
hospital in Glasgow, Scotland, because he refused to have anything to
do with training which involved abortions. Dr Everett Julyan said
that, when the hospital informed him that his application had been
unsuccessful, they volunteered the information that his answer to the
question about abortions had been the reason. He was making his
allegations public in order to stop other doctors facing the same
discrimination. North Glasgow Universities Hospitals Trust has
launched an investigation into Dr Julyan's claim. [BBC News online, 7
October;
Guardian, 9 October] The 1967 Abortion Act includes a
so-called conscience clause which allows doctors not "to participate
in any treatment authorised by this Act to which he has a
conscientious objection".
A doctor at Basildon hospital in Essex, England, has been suspended
while allegations of so-called mercy killings are investigated by the
police. A police spokesman confirmed that a number of deaths were
being looked at, although it is reported that no children were
involved. The police statement confirmed that they were "investigating
allegations ... concerning inappropriate use of medicines on
seriously ill patients ... following concerns raised by an internal
investigation." A spokesman for the hospital trust said that the woman
doctor concerned had been suspended "some time ago". [BBC News online,
7 October;
Southend Evening Echo, 6 October]
It has been reported that there are now 19 British families seeking to
create and select test-tube babies in order to treat their older
children, following the case of Molly Nash whose brother Adam was
selected and born in Minnesota recently to provide her with stem cells
for transplant. Six of the British couples approached Dr Yury
Verlinsky at the Reproductive Genetics Institute in Chicago where Adam
Nash was created, and the others have approached four of the five
clinics licensed to carry out pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in
England. The Human Fertility and Embryology Authority will have to
decide whether to authorise the technique in the UK. [
Sunday Telegraph
and Zenit news agency, 8 October]
Greenpeace, the environmental pressure group, has claimed that two
genetics companies have already conducted experiments which involved
mixing human and pig embryos. The group claimed that the nucleus of a
pig cell was removed and replaced by one taken from an unborn baby,
and that the resulting embryo was allowed to grow for a week. It said
that Stem Cell Sciences (Australia) and Biotransplant (United States)
had applied for a patent on such technology. [Zenit news agency, 6
October] Paul Tully, general secretary of the Society for the
Protection of Unborn Children, commented: "It appears that these
companies are trying to overcome one of the major obstacles to
wide-scale human cloning--the problem of obtaining supplies of human
egg cells. This raises the question of whether the biotech industries
are working for or against the interests of humanity."
The mayor of Manila in the Philippines has said that he will arrest
any government official and raid any importer's warehouse should they
attempt to import the RU-486 abortion drug. Mayor Lito Atienza, who is
also president of Prolife Philippines, described RU-486 as a
"do-it-yourself murder kit" and said that he was sworn to uphold the
constitution of the country which explicitly protects the unborn from
the moment of conception. It was reported that the mayor's
announcement came in response to comments by the country's health
secretary that the drug could be authorised for use by victims of rape
or incest. [Zenit news agency, 8 October]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012