News, 16 October 2000
The director of the largest chain of abortion clinics in Britain has
called for abortion to be accepted as an ordinary method of
controlling fertility rather than as a problem or a failure. Ann
Furedi, director of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, which
performs about 50,000 abortions in Britain each year, told a
conference on abortion law that policymakers should "stop using the
abortion rate as the indicator of a problem" but "accept it as an
essential method of family planning". She observed: "Sex is an
accepted part of an adult relationship for which we do not expect to
suffer unwanted consequences." Her comments have been seen as a
contribution to the campaign to abolish the current legal criteria
according to which a woman can only procure an abortion if she would
otherwise suffer 'injury to physical or mental health'. [
Daily Mail,
16 October]
An Irish national newspaper has reported that the All-Party Committee
on the Constitution has failed to reach a consensus on the abortion
issue and that the three main political parties will all propose
different approaches in the report which is expected to be finalised
next Wednesday. Fianna Fáil is said to favour a referendum question
which would outlaw abortion in cases of threatened suicide but provide
doctors with legal protection when lives of unborn children are lost
in the course of essential medical treatment to protect the life of
the mother. Fine Gael members support maintaining the current law
unchanged but spending 50 million pounds on a new state agency to
reduce crisis pregnancies. The Labour party supports the provision of
abortion when there is a substantial threat to the life of the mother,
including risk of suicide. [
The Irish Times, 14 October]
Heads of government of European Union countries, meeting in
Biarritz, France, voted last Saturday to accept the new Charter of
Fundamental Rights. However, they did not agree on the extent, if at
all, to which the charter should be binding. Article three of the
charter prohibits "eugenic practices, in particular, those whose
objective is the selection of persons". It also prohibits the
reproductive cloning of humans [thus making a distinction between
reproductive and so-called therapeutic cloning]. [Zenit news agency,
15 October]
A document published by the Vatican in preparation for the Jubilee of
Families last weekend stated that legislators should he held partly
responsible for the "abominable crime" of abortion. The document,
drawn up by the Pontifical Council for the Family, also put
responsibility for abortions on the women who procured them, other
family members, groups which campaigned for abortion, and fathers who
either directly pressurised women to have abortions or who left them
"alone to face the problems of pregnancy". The document also singled
out international organisations [such as the United Nations] when it
stated: "A general and no less serious responsibility lies with
international institutions, foundations and associations which
systematically campaign for the legalisation and spread of abortion in
the world." [
LifeSite Daily News, 12 October]
Reports that the drug to be taken in conjunction with RU-486 to induce
abortions had never been authorised for use by pregnant women in the
United States have been treated cautiously by some commentators. Drug
makers Searle had warned that misoprostol, which expels the body of an
unborn child killed by RU-486, had been developed as an anti-ulcer
drug and had not been approved for obstetric use. Pro-life congressman
Tom Coburn questioned the sincerity of Searle's warning, saying: "The
FDA [Food and Drug Administration] wrote the letter to give Searle
legal protection in future lawsuits from women who will be harmed by
the two-drug combination." [
Covenant News, 13/16 October;
LifeSite
Daily News, 13 October]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012