News, 20 November 2000
Tony Blair, the British prime minister, has affirmed his personal
support for stem cell research on human embryos. In a speech to the
European Bioscience Conference in London last Friday, Mr Blair
suggested that moral concerns over such research were "anti-science"
and said: "...our conviction about what is natural or right should not
inhibit the role of science in discovering the truth." He continued:
"Some people are opposed in principle to all forms of embryo research
on ethical grounds. But we must also recognise that when stem cell
research has huge potential to improve the lives of those suffering
from disease, there are also strong ethical arguments in favour..." [
Daily Telegraph, 18 November;
Prime Minister's speech, 10 Downing Street Newsroom, 17 November]
The Conservative opposition's front bench health spokesman was among
those who spoke out against research into so-called therapeutic cloning
in the British House of Commons last Friday. Dr Philip Hammond warned
that science was pushing ahead of the moral consensus. John Smeaton,
national director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children,
commented: "It is encouraging that we appear to have a more
ethically-aware Conservative front bench team than when the Human
Fertilisation and Embryology Act was debated under Margaret Thatcher,
when human experimentation was legalised with her backing..." Yvette
Cooper, a government health minister, spoke in the debate to stress her
support for government proposals to authorise cloning research. The
adjournment debate ended without any vote on the subject itself. [
BBC News online, 17 November;
SPUC media release, 17 November]
Lord Winston, the prominent pro-abortion British fertility expert, has
called for a public debate over whether gene technology should be used
to modify the genetic codes of human beings permanently so as to
eradicate serious genetic anomalies. Lord Winston acknowledged the risk
that genetic engineering could be used for social rather than medical
reasons, and also warned that altering the DNA of future generations
could have serious unforeseen consequences. [
BBC News online, 17 November]
A national opinion poll in the Republic of Ireland has indicated that a
clear majority favour a new referendum to resolve the abortion issue.
The
Irish Independent/IMS
poll found that 62 percent of respondents favoured a referendum
offering a clear choice as to whether abortion should be permitted in
some cases or ruled out in all cases, while 27 percent were against.
Support for a referendum was relatively evenly spread between both
sexes and between all ages, regions and classes. [
The Irish Independent, 18 November]
Researchers at the University of Leicester, England, have claimed that
Mirena, an intra-uterine device (IUD) or coil which releases small
amounts of the hormone progestagen, could help to prevent some of the
side-effects associated with tamoxifen, a drug used to prevent
recurrence of breast cancer. [The reports erroneously described IUDs as
contraceptives, when in fact they are thought to function primarily as
abortifacients by preventing fertilised eggs from implanting in the
lining of the womb.] [
BBC News online, 17 November]
The Catholic archdiocese of Vancouver, Canada, has told Catholics that
the right to life should be the most important issue when deciding how
to vote in the country's general election later this month. The
archdiocesan Office of Life and Family published
A Canadian Catholic Voter's Catechism,
under the authority of Archbishop Adam Exner, which stated: "The most
basic of all our rights is the right to life - the right from which all
other rights flow ... First, we must vote for candidates and parties
that uphold the right to life for all Canadians, and for all human
beings everywhere." [
LifeSite Daily News, 17 November]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012