News, 1 November 2000
Members of the British House of Commons yesterday rejected by a margin
of more than two to one a bill which would have authorised research on
cloned human embryos. Dr Evan Harris, who acknowledged during his
speech that a large number of people had written to their MPs opposing
the measure, saw his 10-minute rule bill defeated by 175 votes to 83.
John Smeaton, national director of the Society for the Protection of
Unborn Children, commented: "This is a healthy start to our campaign
against human cloning. However, while Dr Harris' bill has failed, I
have had a letter from the government this week which made it clear
that they will be introducing regulations to facilitate research on
cloned human embryos before the year is out. Tony Blair [the prime
minister] has given his personal support to destructive research on
human embryos. The government mistakenly claims that research on
cloned human embryos does not raise any new ethical issues. I am
astonished at their blindness." [SPUC eye-witness and
media release,
31 October]
A British pro-life lobbying group has lodged an appeal in the English
High Court in what has been described as a last-ditch attempt to
prevent the operation to separate Siamese twins Jodie and Mary. The
procedure to save Jodie would entail the direct killing of Mary.
Lawyers acting for Bruno Quintavalle, director of the Pro-Life
Alliance, will try on Friday to have Laurence Oates, the official
solicitor, removed as Mary's guardian. This could then leave the way
open for the case to be taken to the House of Lords. Robin Cooper, who
is representing Mr Quintavalle, said that the House of Lords would
have been very willing to have heard the case if the official
solicitor had decided to lodge the appeal, and that his decision not
to do so had denied Mary a decision at the highest level. [
BBC News
online, 31 October]
The Vatican has strongly condemned the morning-after pill. A document
issued yesterday by the
Pontifical Academy for Life criticised the
decision to make the drug available in Italy as "a method of emergency
contraception" because it is not contraceptive but works by expelling
an embryo from the womb. The document stated that "it is clear that in
fact the morning-after pill is nothing other than an abortion obtained
by chemical means", and said that those who distributed or prescribed
it were "morally responsible" for an abortion. As such, it urged
health workers to become "conscientious objectors" by refusing to have
anything to do with such "new hidden forms of aggression" against
unborn human life. [Zenit news agency, 31 October]
A researcher in England has warned that induced abortions will lead to
a 60 percent rise in the incidence of breast cancer between 1993 and
2023. Patrick Carroll, whose research was commissioned by the Life
charity, is director of the Pension and Population Research Institute.
He told the Royal Statistical Society that figures released by the
Office for National Statistics indicated a steep increase in breast
cancer rates among women in the later 40s between 1985 and 1993. He
concluded: "There may be other reasons for this increase, such as
hormonal contraception and the reduction in the average size of
families, but the greater incidence of abortion is probably the main
factor." [Zenit news agency, 31 October]
A court in Holland has further extended the boundaries within which
euthanasia is tolerated. The present situation is that euthanasia is
tolerated only if the patient is experiencing "unbearable suffering,
devoid of any hope", but a doctor who gave a lethal drug cocktail to a
severely depressed 86-year-old former politician, despite the fact
that he was not suffering unbearable physical pain, has been acquitted
by a court in Haarlem on the basis that "unbearable suffering" need
not necessarily entail unrelenting physical pain. Legislation which
would officially legalise euthanasia in Holland is still being
considered by the Dutch parliament. [Zenit news agency, 31 October]
A team of 10 specialists in Austria have performed complex and
life-saving heart surgery on an unborn child no larger than a tennis
ball. The unborn child needed to have a defective heart valve rebuilt,
and would have died within two weeks had the operation not gone ahead.
Dr Wolfgang Arzt, who led the team, said: "We went through the womb,
through the placenta, through the ribs of the foetus into the heart.
From there we went into the right ventricle with an ultra-fine needle." A balloon catheter was then inserted into a valve and
expanded to create an opening four millimetres wide. [
Daily Record, 1
November]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012