News, 5 December 2000
A national Catholic newspaper reported over the weekend that the
British government has postponed its plans to make the morning-after
pill available from pharmacists without a doctor's prescription "due
to pressure from pro-life groups". It had been suggested that the
government might rush through reclassification of Schering's
Levonelle-2 morning-after pill before Christmas. Meanwhile, police in
Manchester, England, have refused to follow up a request made by
Frances Morris to prosecute the government over its plans to
reclassify Levonelle-2. Mrs Morris, a mother of eight, believes that
the plans breach both the Offences Against the Person Act of 1861 (for
supplying drugs to cause an abortion) and the Sexual Offences Act of
1956 (for aiding and abetting sex with a minor). [
The Universe, 3
December]
The French Chamber of Deputies will vote definitively today (5
December) on a bill to liberalise abortion laws. As well as increasing
the legal time limit for abortions from 10 to 12 weeks' gestation, the
law will also allow minors both to obtain abortions, and also to
receive the morning-after pill from pharmacists, without parental
consent. [Zenit news agency, 1 December]
It has emerged that the medical licensing authorities in Ireland have
refused to license the Levonelle-2 morning-after pill because it is an
abortifacient rather than a contraceptive and, as such, prohibited by
law. A Canadian newspaper reported that this was despite attempts by
pro-abortion medical practitioners to claim that pregnancy started at
implantation rather than at conception. [
Toronto Globe and Mail, via
LifeSite News, 1 December; also Unison News, 3 December]
It has been claimed that a major Islamic group in Indonesia has agreed
to stock the morning-after pill in its clinics after concluding that
the abortifacient drug does not breach the teachings of Islam. A
conference of Asian family planning organisations and the pro-abortion
World Health Organisation in Colombo, Sri Lanka, heard that the
Postinor-2 morning-after pill had also been successfully introduced
into Sri Lanka, but had hit opposition from religious groups in Kenya
and Mexico. It is reported that the World Health Organisation and an
international coalition of family planning agencies are engaged in a
campaign to promote Postinor-2 in the developing world. [SABI, 4
December; via
Northern Light]
The Austrian cabinet minister with responsibility for women's affairs
has sparked controversy by describing abortions carried out on the
grounds of foetal abnormality as "intolerable". Herbert Haupt called
for a review of Austria's 1974 abortion law which allows abortion up
to birth in cases of mental or physical handicap. He also insisted
that the fathers of unborn children should be involved in the decision
whether to abort. Mr Haupt's Freedom party is in a coalition
government with the People's party of Chancellor Wolfgang Schuessel,
who told pro-life groups in July: "The fundamental basis of credible
politics is the protection of life, and the People's party will push
for a corresponding change in the current legislation." [AFP, 3
December; from Pro-Life Infonet]
The adopted daughter of Vicente Fox, Mexico's new president, has vowed
to fight against legalised abortion in her country. Ana Cristina, who
is 21 years old and at law school, said: "I understand that to be
raped must be really hard, especially if the result is pregnancy, but
you can't forget you are carrying a life inside you ... and at the
hour you decide to abort, you are killing it. You can say what you
want, but an abortion is murder." Vicente Fox took office as president
of Mexico last Friday, two hours after visiting the shrine of Our Lady
of Guadalupe [patroness of the unborn]. He is personally opposed to
abortion, though believes that abortion law should be decided by the
states rather than at a federal level. [Toronto Star, 30 November;
EWTN News, 5 December]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012