News, 29 December 2000
More than 3,300 women obtained the abortifacient morning-after pill
from pharmacists without a doctor's prescription during an eight-month
trial in south London. This figure represents 1.7 percent of all women
of child-bearing age in the area. The department of health and
pro-abortion groups welcomed the news, claiming that it confirmed the
demand for [erroneously so-called] emergency contraception. Experts
predicted that the proportion of women using the morning-after pill
once it became available from pharmacists nationwide would be
significantly higher than the rate in the south London trial because
it would be more easily available and accompanied by a huge publicity
drive. [
This is London, 29 December 2000]
The Italian health minister yesterday announced his support for
destructive research on cloned human embryos. Umberto Veronesi
accepted the conclusions of an expert group which had been considering
the issue of embryonic stem cell research and so-called therapeutic
cloning. [
EWTN News, 29 December 2000]
Taiwan yesterday officially legalised use of the RU-486 abortion drug.
Lee Ming-liang, minister of health, claimed that the drug "offered
women an alternative to abortion". The drug will be authorised for use
by women to kill their unborn children up to the seventh week of
pregnancy, and will be taken in conjunction with Misoprostol, a drug
which expels the aborted child from the womb. [
AFP, 28 December 2000,
from China Times]
The first babies to be conceived from both frozen eggs and frozen
sperm have been born in Singapore. The twins were delivered by
caesarean section, after their older siblings had died in the womb
during a previous unsuccessful attempt. Dr Cheng Li Chang, who
pioneered the technique, said that it afforded hope to couples in
which both partners had fertility problems, but admitted that much
more research was needed. [
BBC News online, 29 December 2000]
A committee of bishops and scientists in the United States has
reported significant areas of common ground on the issue of cloning,
but also serious differences. The committee's report, which was sent
to all US Catholic bishops earlier this month, signalled agreement
that "the cloning of animals and of human genes and somatic cells--except from embryos--for research purposes is morally neutral".
However, whereas the scientists supported destructive research on
human embryos, the bishops insisted that this could not be
permissible. All participants agreed that reproductive cloning should
not be attempted for now, although the scientists wanted to leave the
door open to this in the future and both sides agreed that it would
happen eventually. The report admitted that "the committee does not
believe it possible to achieve consensus on two of the doctrinal
assertions made, namely that the embryo is a human being subject to
rights and that reproduction should not be separated from marriage."
[
Catholic News Service, 28 December 2000]
Statistics released by Taiwan's Bureau of National Health Insurance
have indicated that there were 42,282 abortions in the country last
year. However, the secretary-general of the Obstetrics and Gynecology
Association said that the total for the year could be as high as
100,000 when totals from private clinics were included. It was also
reported that the average age of women seeking abortions in Taiwan had
fallen. Abortion is now the fifth most common surgical procedure in
Taiwan. [
Taipei Times, 23 December 2000]
Pro-lifers in the American state of Texas have welcomed the swearing-in
of Rick Perry as the new governor. Texas Right to Life expressed
confidence that Governor Perry, who replaces US President-elect George
W Bush, would "continue the strong pro-life governorship that we have
seen in Texas over the past six years". [Texas Right to Life, 22
December 2000, from Pro-Life Infonet]
To subscribe to SPUC's email information services, please visit www.spuc.org.uk/em-signup. The reliability of the news herein is dependent on that of the cited sources, which are paraphrased rather than quoted. Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the society. © Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, 2012