You are not currently logged in.
Log in
Abortion judgement will cause confusion and anger, says SPUC
Westminster, 23rd January 2006 - The Society for the Protection of
Unborn Children (SPUC) said today that parents will be confused and
angry at the judgment of Mr Justice Silber in the Sue Axon case today.
Paul Tully, SPUC general secretary, commented: "Abortion, as well as
killing an unborn child, can have long-term physical, social and
psychological effects on young women - and this is acknowledged and
emphasised by the judge. We believe that the judgment was right to
stress these health risks, as well as acknowledging the social, moral,
religious and cultural issues at stake.
"However, abortions and abortion-inducing drugs are routinely provided
for under-16 year-olds by the Department of Health, flouting the 1985
legal guidelines on provision of contraception and abortion to
under-16s that the judge said were valid and of great importance.
"The judgment is written in the assumption that the guidelines are
widely known and carefully observed. In effect the judge pays
lip-service to the 1985 rules, while ignoring the contempt in which
they are held by health officials.
"The demands from the pro-abortion lobby that it should be allowed to
provide young teenagers with abortions secretly (keeping GPs as well
as parents in the dark) shows how brazen it has become. Mr Silber's
judgment will encourage the pro-abortion lobby to become more vehement
in its demands. Mr Silber's inclusion of contentious statements, such
as the claim that a "right to abortion" exists in English law, is
disturbing. It suggests that his thinking is dominated by those who
campaign to create such a right by asserting that it already exists,
and ignores Parliament's decision in 1967 to legalise abortion only in
specific situations, primarily of risk to the life or health of the
pregnant woman."