Anthony Ozimic of SPUC said: "We understand that the report is wholly
favourable towards the creation of human clones for research.
"This report will have no credibility, as the committee's
membership was stacked with supporters of human cloning, many with
close links to bodies with a vested interest in embryo research. Only
two out of 11 members had voted against the government's cloning
regulations in January 2001.
"The committee's chairman, the Bishop of Oxford, has long been
an advocate of human cloning. His controversial religious views on the
embryo have been used as a veneer to cloak the committee's bias in
favour of destructive embryo research.
"Only pro-cloning scientists were explicitly invited by the
committee to give evidence and even the committee's scientific advisor,
Professor Christopher Higgins, is also an advocate of human cloning.
Furthermore, it seems like the purpose of this committee has been to
provide justification for a law which has already been passed.
"The European Parliament has passed a resolution condemning Britain for its stance on cloning.
"Dr David Prentice, an advisor to the US Congress on stem cell
research, has said that there is no guarantee that the use of stem
cells extracted from clones will solve the problem of rejection in
recipients, because cloned embryos created by cell nuclear transfer
would inherit some of the genetic make-up of the egg donor in the
mitochondria.
"Research using stem cells from adults in various parts of the
world is showing promise as an alternative to cloned embryo cells."
Additional facts on post-natal stem cells: