Speaking in yesterday's debate on the International Development
Bill, Baroness Amos, a foreign office minister, said: "I do not agree
that the [International Development] Bill should include a requirement
for the Secretary of State to take account of a government's human
rights record in determining the nature and scale of assistance for its
people."
Anthony Ozimic, SPUC's political secretary, commented: "This refusal to
make overseas aid conditional on the human rights record of the
recipient country makes a complete mockery of the government's
so-called ethical foreign policy. Indeed, millions of pounds of British
taxpayers' money are being passed through the United Nations Population
Fund for use in China's one-child policy, which the British government
admits is coercive.
"Even one of the International Development department's own
publications states that British-funded organisations involved in
China's population policy have not moderated gross violations of human
rights, such as the ethnic cleansing of the Tibetan people through
forced abortions and sterilisation," Ozimic said.
Ozimic added: "We welcome yesterday's move by Baroness Young
and a cross-party coalition of peers to amend the Bill and force the
government to stop funding human rights abuses in the developing
world."
Baroness Young, with the support of Lord Alton of Liverpool,
Baroness Cox and Baroness Rawlings, tabled an amendment to Clause 7(5)
of the bill, which reads: "Assistance may not be provided to any person
or body that is assisting, promoting or practising coercive population
policies".
As is often customary at committee-stage, this motion was withdrawn for consideration at report stage. The report stage of the bill in the House of Lords will be on Tuesday 16 October.