The National Director of SPUC in the UK, John Smeaton, said: "The
action of the Bishops in supporting the wording of this referendum is
deplorable. They are giving credence to a proposal that suggests that
early abortion can be discounted. The suggested wording has other
serious flaws besides.
"Although is it argued that this does not in itself weaken the
protection of the unborn in the constitution, it is clear to any common
sense observer that this is the wider aim of the proposal.
"This is not purely an Irish domestic matter. As an issue of
human rights, abortion always transcends national boundaries, but in
this case the international community has a very specific and serious
cause for concern, and we alerted the Bishops to this. The wording of
the amendment is designed to facilitate the promotion of early abortion
by such means as the morning after pill and the intra-uterine device.
Legislators and judges around the world could pick up on the
re-definition of abortion in this proposal and use it to undermine the
status of the early embryo in other countries.
"We would urge the Irish people to stand by their prophetic commitment
to the rights of the unborn child. They have been given bad advice in
similar circumstances in the past, and they are being given bad advice
now. They should demand a truly pro-life wording for the coming
referendum."
In the 1992 referendum on abortion, the Irish Bishops advised
that people could legitimately vote in favour of allowing advertising
and travel arrangements for abortions abroad. These proposals were
successful, and appear to have had a damaging impact on number of Irish
women travelling to Britain for abortions.
Other serious flaws in the proposals are noted in a summary of expert legal opinion.