SPUC was reacting to news that the HFEA has issued a policy
document on the genetic screening of embryos and has confirmed the
possibility that deaf couples may be allowed to choose only deaf babies
conceived through in vitro
fertilisation (IVF). The HFEA said that "designing" babies for
intelligence or looks is "off the agenda" but confirmed the possibility
of deliberately selecting babies with disabilities.
Alison Davis, national co-ordinator of the handicap division of the
Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, who herself has spina
bifida, said: "Already scientists are able to detect some disabilities
in human embryos, which are then thrown away. Soon it will be possible
to detect many more conditions by extracting a few cells from the
embryo and carrying out genetic screening. Now they are suggesting that
the opposite practice might be possible--to throw away the non-disabled
embryos and allow only those with a disability to be implanted in the
womb.
"The idea of deliberately producing disabled babies is simply
an extension of the current belief that there is a 'right to choose'
the kind of baby whom an individual will accept or reject. Of course,
in most cases this means that disabled children are thrown away or
killed by abortion, but the principle is equally unjust and unethical
in the case of rejecting non-disabled babies.
"The truth is that every human being, disabled or not, has
infinite value and should be welcomed into the world whatever his or
her abilities. 'Manufacturing' human beings, and then rejecting those
who do not measure up to our ideas of what is desirable, is a form of
eugenics which should be rejected by all who recognise and respect the
value of human beings.
"Designing children and throwing away those we choose to reject for whatever reason is a form of fatal discrimination, which should not be tolerated in any civilised society."