In separate letters to those MPs who either supported Evan Harris's
recent 10-minute rule bill to authorise research on cloned human
embryos, or who failed to register any vote, John Smeaton, national
director of SPUC, writes: "A fully grown adult is genetically identical
to the one-day old embryo from which he or she grew, whether created
through fertilisation or via a cloning technique. However, pro-cloning
scientists seem to confuse the genetic identity of the human embryo
with its physical appearance, size, etc. How can we give ethical and
legal approval to so-called therapeutic cloning when its promoters are
unsure of the identity and nature of the embryo?"
Mr Smeaton observes in his letter that the European parliament
has accused pro-cloning scientists of using "linguistic sleight of hand
to erode the moral significance of human cloning" [7 September 2000].
He asks why these same scientists dismiss the already proven potential
of adult stem cells as an ethical alternative to those derived from
embryos.
Mr Smeaton challenges the MPs to reveal their position on this
fundamental issue before the government's own proposals to authorise
research on cloned embryos are voted on, probably before the new year.
Dr Evan Harris's bill to authorise research on cloned human embryos for so-called therapeutic purposes was rejected in the House of Commons on 31 October by 175 votes to 83. The adjournment debate on the subject is planned for 17 November, and a vote in both houses of parliament on a statutory instrument which would authorise research into so-called therapeutic cloning is expected before the end of this calendar year.